
How exactly does own work on a polaroid? Apart from pressing the button?
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 10:18,
archived)

was taken on a 5X4 view camera on a 6 minute exposure and an aperture of f.32. its part of a set of dystopian night landscapes.
if your not a photographer all that means is that it was a bunch of effort
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 10:24,
archived)
if your not a photographer all that means is that it was a bunch of effort

The shopping trolleys are used as cheap taxis, you take them home with your shopping, bash them to bits to get your pound back, then leave them in the street for the kids to ride them into peoples cars.
Fun for all teh family...
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 10:37,
archived)
Fun for all teh family...

I shit mesen everytime we get a driving visitor and I hear the children 'playing'.
often followed by the sounds of stuff breaking
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:14,
archived)
often followed by the sounds of stuff breaking

it strikes me as being somewhat pretentious
it's not the tools y'know it's really not
you say you've created a dystopian night landscape, I see a picture of a bus stop
I expect I'd understand it if I had a degree or something
and I wouldn't call myself a photographer, I just take photos of things
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 10:39,
archived)
it's not the tools y'know it's really not
you say you've created a dystopian night landscape, I see a picture of a bus stop
I expect I'd understand it if I had a degree or something
and I wouldn't call myself a photographer, I just take photos of things

you try taking that on a digital, won't look the same its the colour cast
also thats only one of a set so the general feeling is lost a bit
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 10:42,
archived)
also thats only one of a set so the general feeling is lost a bit

but can't you change the settings on most digital SLRs so that they mimic the colours of most films? That, and tattyshop will help out. Seems to me that if you use film, you limit yourself to what the film can do. Digital you can play with all day long.
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 10:45,
archived)

but 5X4 cameras with digital backs are massively expensive and you just can't get the quality or aperture from a DSLR
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 10:49,
archived)

my nikon can happily do a 32 aperture and six minute exposure
admitiedly, I'd have to hold down the button for 6 minutes, but nonetheless
/edit if you think I'm getting mouthy, please let me know, I'm having a very stressful day in work, I'm quitting smoking and my cat is dying so I may well be over-reacting
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 10:55,
archived)
admitiedly, I'd have to hold down the button for 6 minutes, but nonetheless
/edit if you think I'm getting mouthy, please let me know, I'm having a very stressful day in work, I'm quitting smoking and my cat is dying so I may well be over-reacting

the girlfriend has a photography degree, and I have limited crime-scene photography training. We've debated film v digital a lot.
She loves digi but maintains there is a time and place for film. I also think she gets a kick out of being able to develop her stuff by herself.
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 10:59,
archived)
She loves digi but maintains there is a time and place for film. I also think she gets a kick out of being able to develop her stuff by herself.

the bit where it magically appears on the paper is the best
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:02,
archived)

...like Synthesisers. I think digital wins over film though purely for the instant gratification. I have used one roll of 35mm film in my whole life, and only about 7 of the photos turned out.
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:08,
archived)

Crime scene photo training?
Don't you still have to use film only for that? Just wondered coz that's what I got told waaaaaaaay back in the mists of time when I tried to become a photographer for the police.
I likes film, but rarely use it these days..
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:16,
archived)
Don't you still have to use film only for that? Just wondered coz that's what I got told waaaaaaaay back in the mists of time when I tried to become a photographer for the police.
I likes film, but rarely use it these days..

with the advent digital watermark systems and such.
Also, you have to keep all the original pictures you take on the memory card. Even if they're crap or all blurry, you keep them. Keeps the chain of evidence intact.
And if you DO have to change them in anyway, you make and edit a copy. The system will then log every pixel that's changed and how it has changed.
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:20,
archived)
Also, you have to keep all the original pictures you take on the memory card. Even if they're crap or all blurry, you keep them. Keeps the chain of evidence intact.
And if you DO have to change them in anyway, you make and edit a copy. The system will then log every pixel that's changed and how it has changed.

Sounds much better..
Didn't get any training out of it, got told after the first interviewy thing that I was the wrong sort for the job (damn my socialist parents and their protesting ways)
Still, would've been an interesting (and probably depressing) job.. Trying to find the materiality and textures of a knifing, maybe aim to do a certain crime scene in the theme of a biblical ethic and all that..
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:27,
archived)
Didn't get any training out of it, got told after the first interviewy thing that I was the wrong sort for the job (damn my socialist parents and their protesting ways)
Still, would've been an interesting (and probably depressing) job.. Trying to find the materiality and textures of a knifing, maybe aim to do a certain crime scene in the theme of a biblical ethic and all that..

however your nikon cannot do f64 or 5X4 large format images thats 10,200X13,600 pixel images
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:01,
archived)

I have actually produced a number of 100,000 X 21,000 images via the magic of photostitching
admitiddly I haven't tried any long exposure ones like that and I'm not sure it would quite work
but more importantly at those kind of dimensions my computer crashes any time I try to open the final stitched image
all things are possible
well I'm not so sure about f64, none of my lenses can do that
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:06,
archived)
admitiddly I haven't tried any long exposure ones like that and I'm not sure it would quite work
but more importantly at those kind of dimensions my computer crashes any time I try to open the final stitched image
all things are possible
well I'm not so sure about f64, none of my lenses can do that

(yes i know you can shop that out but EFFORT!)
its all debatable but i like using film and digital cos you can do stuff with one that you can't with the other.
versatility is the name of the game
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:10,
archived)
its all debatable but i like using film and digital cos you can do stuff with one that you can't with the other.
versatility is the name of the game

to get a camera to have the capability to properly mimic a particular type of camera you need a fancy camera or to use tattyshop to manipulate ti you kinda need to know what you're doing
however
fuck that, you don't need fancy shit, I've taken some of my best photos with shitty shitty camera phones or a 20 quid digital
a shitty digitial will give you all the low down phunked up lo fi feel of a 1963 rizla box slr 2 stroke whatever with fungi pixie 23.6 film or whatever bollocks you happen to have
but film is essentially limiting, I don't understand why you would restrict yourself to only 23 shots or having to ait a day to find out if you rpoduced anything worthwhile
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 10:53,
archived)
however
fuck that, you don't need fancy shit, I've taken some of my best photos with shitty shitty camera phones or a 20 quid digital
a shitty digitial will give you all the low down phunked up lo fi feel of a 1963 rizla box slr 2 stroke whatever with fungi pixie 23.6 film or whatever bollocks you happen to have
but film is essentially limiting, I don't understand why you would restrict yourself to only 23 shots or having to ait a day to find out if you rpoduced anything worthwhile

but from the very little i know, film can be made to do pretty much anything in the right hands.
also love the use of the word dystopian instead of grim.
/has an art degree although you'd never guess blog.
but i do like digital, fire off hundreds of shots and pick the best 2, dump the rest, result.
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 10:55,
archived)
also love the use of the word dystopian instead of grim.
/has an art degree although you'd never guess blog.
but i do like digital, fire off hundreds of shots and pick the best 2, dump the rest, result.

Like "I will only paint this picture on tuesdays" or I will sculpt this statue with one arm and hopping
does it really add anything to the final work?
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:00,
archived)
does it really add anything to the final work?

why use charcoal? pencils do the same thing.
yes they do but it ain't the same.
similar thing with film v digi
edit: and another thing is that any muppet can take a decent digi image whereas film requires a certain level of skill and patience
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:04,
archived)
yes they do but it ain't the same.
similar thing with film v digi
edit: and another thing is that any muppet can take a decent digi image whereas film requires a certain level of skill and patience

I reckon didgital just makes it easier to take a shite photo
if you're going to take shite photos, using film won't help but at least if you use digital you can see right away that it's shite and maybe take another better one
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:12,
archived)
if you're going to take shite photos, using film won't help but at least if you use digital you can see right away that it's shite and maybe take another better one

i like both mediums and will continue to use them for as long as i can be arsed
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:15,
archived)

i gave up on all that 'being true to the materials nonsense' it's results that count in the end, processes are all well and lovely and it's handy if you know how to do things old school, but ultimately who gives a shit, i'd much rather do something in 5 mins that traditionally took hours.
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:04,
archived)

you could get really creepy looks to things, all grainy and spooky, was hard to imitate any other way.
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:19,
archived)

i'm a great believer in using whichever technique
is best suited to getting the desired result.old school can be a lot more fun to do but unless you're a performance artist where the doing is the 'art' does how you got to the result matter.
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:49,
archived)
is best suited to getting the desired result.old school can be a lot more fun to do but unless you're a performance artist where the doing is the 'art' does how you got to the result matter.

For old mechanical tools, and things you can actually see working, like vinyl and film cameras and carburettors. I wouldn't claim the results are better, but the process should be part of the fun as well. You might have to be a geeky engineer to appreciate it.
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 10:57,
archived)

but to me vinyl is a sound wave solidified in plastic, you can actually see it, look, there it is
and who the fuck is making that noise? it's liek an invisible spiderman on the window
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:01,
archived)
and who the fuck is making that noise? it's liek an invisible spiderman on the window

I love putting things together that normally wouldn't be involved with each other. Most recently: Electric Violins and Vocoders.
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:39,
archived)

...it looks just like a photo taken with a camera phone.
sorry.
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 11:02,
archived)
sorry.

Or was it automatic?
6 minutes is a long time to stand.
( ,
Sat 2 Feb 2008, 10:38,
archived)
6 minutes is a long time to stand.