b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 8251707 (Thread)

# do you have any idea why a lovely bit of embossing in Photoshop on a lovely big 300dpi image looks shit when you flatten it?
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:33, archived)
# no, that's why I asked you...
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:34, archived)
# yes, but It was me that asked the question in the first place
If I don't know, then you don't know

unhelpful git!
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:34, archived)
# Losing it again Bilbo?
;)

How do?
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:34, archived)
# yup
bloody annoying photoshop!

not bad, you?
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:36, archived)
# Im great cheers :D
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:37, archived)
# Woooooooo!
Congratters :)
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:45, archived)
# Thanks Trelly :)
Arent you preggers? Or am I thinking of someone else?
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:58, archived)
# congrats
Ningles all
so does this make you the Man from Uncle?
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 9:08, archived)
# Thank you :)
It makes me the
.............................2
Man from Uncle
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 9:21, archived)
# on a proof or on screen?
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:37, archived)
# on screen
After years of using Tatty shop I should know, but....


It's got maximum depth and softening and looks perfect in layers, yet when you flatten it, it looks like a bad vector
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:41, archived)
# Whats wrong with Paint you tart?
;)
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:42, archived)
# Dulux don't do 300dpi
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:44, archived)
# Hahaha
'ningles all!

:D
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:55, archived)
# Have you tried Crown?
They have a new range out ;)
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:59, archived)
# have you got the PSD handy?
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:45, archived)
# yes
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:50, archived)
# haha good
send me it and I'll have a look

oh, have you tried placing it in InDesign and flattening it there?
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:53, archived)
# it's 400MB
placing into InDesign as a psd?

hmmm.....
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 8:54, archived)
# aha, bit hefty then
hrr, I dunno

/helpful blog
(, Fri 4 Apr 2008, 9:05, archived)