I've long thought the relationship between macro- & micro- to appear to be fascinatingly similar - from an atomic level to interplanetary, though I know little of the laws that govern them.
(Je suis un vagabondis an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob,
Tue 15 Apr 2008, 16:05,
archived)
If you get into quantum explanations of the atomic level, it'll be less striking.
is that you assume something totally ridiculous at the outset to justify a result you know to be true. I like it but I don't really believe it for a moment.
Unless I'm meaning something very different by the Bohmian approach but I don't think so. You arbitrarily change you potential and then recover Schroedinger's equation, right?
My memory is a little hazy, but I think he set up something mathematically equivalent to schroedinger, probably with random assumptions, yes.
I remember very pretty drawings showing that instead of a probabilistic approach, you can show deterministic paths for particles diffracting through a slit. Where basically, the path of the particle is determined by exactly which part of the slit it passes through, under the influence of some kind of 'quantum force field'.
I like it and in the unlikely event that I ever have to teach people quantum mechanics that's how I'll start it off, but personally I don't take it very seriously although there are people who do. I also don't take the many-worlds nonsense at all seriously although there are people who do.
I pity anyone I'll ever teach quantum mechanics to.
Haha, it's more intuitive but the maths was pretty horrible if I remember rightly.
I think the best we can really do is be pragmatic, use the formulas that we know work brilliantly, and leave the interpretation to philosophers. I can't really see us being able to distinguish between them experimentally.
my view exactly. feynam once slagged off physicists for being obsessed with a theory of everything and said "they're just algorithms" and i think there's a lot in what he said.
But I'm not nearly intelligenter enough to unnerstand it. I mean - I still have trouble understanding why, when I tilt a picture of a lady in a skirt, I can't see up it.
(Je suis un vagabondis an unfunny, up your own arse middle class knob,
Tue 15 Apr 2008, 16:14,
archived)
Ah, noone understands that.
Pictures of ladies in skirts will forever be a mystery.