Need a light?
CFB (200kb) | More demons and shit at bobtodd.deviantart.com
That's meant to be perspective; not flid arm + giant hand.
'Ning.
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 21:28,
archived)
CFB (200kb) | More demons and shit at bobtodd.deviantart.com
That's meant to be perspective; not flid arm + giant hand.
'Ning.
Oo, sorry. ): I'm not ignoring you; I just forgot to reply.
Ta. (: And don't forget you always have reference right in front of you (unless you are some sort of flid, robot or robot flid).
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 21:52,
archived)
Hehe, no worries
I always draw from my own hand as an example. Maybe that's where it goes wrong ;)
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 21:54,
archived)
I always draw from my own hand as an example. Maybe that's where it goes wrong ;)
Oo, what a fluffy thing to read. :D
I do like your giant pixelmashes.
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 21:35,
archived)
I was sitting here wondering why half his body was hovering over a logfire for a few minutes.
"Perhaps he is trying to piss on the campfire like in those gnome scenes in Golden Axe."
"Oh wait, those aren't logs..."
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 21:36,
archived)
"Oh wait, those aren't logs..."
Ha, oh dear.
I suppose that because I know what it is it didn't occur to me that it might not be obvious to other people.
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 21:38,
archived)
I think it's because you didn't draw lower chest or arm through the fire.
So I kind of just assumed it wasn't there like some ghostly apparition.
N.B: Have you considered doing more deranged demons? Or the same ones with massive chainguns, mowing down people and laughing manically.
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 21:42,
archived)
N.B: Have you considered doing more deranged demons? Or the same ones with massive chainguns, mowing down people and laughing manically.
I do have something akin to the latter in my head;
I've been weighing up whether I can be arsed drawing it. I think I might.
Lower arm is there through the fire; but the fire's outlines overwhelm it.
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 21:44,
archived)
Lower arm is there through the fire; but the fire's outlines overwhelm it.
This is my reference photo, if that makes it easier to understand:
( , Tue 2 Sep 2008, 21:46, archived)
( , Tue 2 Sep 2008, 21:46, archived)
Reference image?
I feel shocked and betrayed.
I just thought you were really good at anatomy :(
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 21:49,
archived)
I just thought you were really good at anatomy :(
Drawing without reference isn't a badge of honour.
In fact, it's a daft thing to do. And you can't get good at anatomy by never using reference.
Kristen Perry explains it better than I could: www.merekatcreations.com/mere_html/tutorials/process.html
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 21:53,
archived)
Kristen Perry explains it better than I could: www.merekatcreations.com/mere_html/tutorials/process.html
Trial and error. You work at something until it looks right.
That way you know how to do anatomy and construction without reference, which helps a lot when you are trying to draw things which you physically couldn't have plausible references for.
It's like saying that when drawing buildings instead of learning perspective you should always just look at references of buildings instead, which is fine for copying shapes and details of architecture. But when it comes that you want to draw a building at a particular angle, and you want to add an arch to it or something, it's unlikely unless you had a particular building that you were drawing from beforehand that you will be able to find a reference from the right angle. I would just like to be able to draw, and not even proper artistic life drawing drawings, but passibly outline or illustrate a human figure without having to find an image of a twirling overcoat from below or something.
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 22:04,
archived)
It's like saying that when drawing buildings instead of learning perspective you should always just look at references of buildings instead, which is fine for copying shapes and details of architecture. But when it comes that you want to draw a building at a particular angle, and you want to add an arch to it or something, it's unlikely unless you had a particular building that you were drawing from beforehand that you will be able to find a reference from the right angle. I would just like to be able to draw, and not even proper artistic life drawing drawings, but passibly outline or illustrate a human figure without having to find an image of a twirling overcoat from below or something.
I find that just looking 'right' often looks quite wrong --
sometimes I'll sketch a picture with no reference, then draw it again with reference. Even though the first one looked right when I did it, I nearly always surprise myself with how much I got wrong when I do the second one.
Yes, you do need to learn perspective/anatomy too, but that's still a kind of reference.
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 22:06,
archived)
Yes, you do need to learn perspective/anatomy too, but that's still a kind of reference.
Well I've just read that link, well I read the preperation and the stuff about reference
and had to skip through the rest due to it being so long.
All I can really comment is that despite using a reference the front hand going for the katana looks wrong. I think it's because in his version as opposed to the reference, the hand is bent down at the wrist slightly and the lower arm is less vertical than it is in the photo. Also the fact the fingers are completely straight and not even slightly bent in preperation to grasp the hilt makes it look unnatural - completely straight fingers themselves being a fairly unnatural pose to be in.
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 22:22,
archived)
All I can really comment is that despite using a reference the front hand going for the katana looks wrong. I think it's because in his version as opposed to the reference, the hand is bent down at the wrist slightly and the lower arm is less vertical than it is in the photo. Also the fact the fingers are completely straight and not even slightly bent in preperation to grasp the hilt makes it look unnatural - completely straight fingers themselves being a fairly unnatural pose to be in.