
Comment on this, also rate it, favourite it and post a Video Response.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN8W77tyfTE&yt&yt
You can watch them alter the stats in realtime.
The view count hasn't changed in hours.
:P
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 19:25,
archived)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN8W77tyfTE&yt&yt
You can watch them alter the stats in realtime.
The view count hasn't changed in hours.
:P

of anyone bar youtube?
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 19:38,
archived)


does that mean you own it any more?
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 19:47,
archived)

Well I'm off now
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 19:50,
archived)

sometimes taking hours, if not a day or so, to upload new figures.
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 20:00,
archived)

as I've just seen a comment stupid enough to make me just stare out of the window drooling.
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 20:09,
archived)

"Very cool. They used to experiment with video feedback to capture spirits of the dead. Google video feeback and ghosts! "
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 20:14,
archived)

google, replete with fun from TLA organisations
youtube fixes viewing results and "innapropriate" comments
good luck with your vain hope
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 19:41,
archived)
youtube fixes viewing results and "innapropriate" comments
good luck with your vain hope

This can be seen very clearly on the one above.
Views: 13,665 - Impossible it's gone viral worldwide, plus the guy has 36,000 subscribers.
Text Comments: 2,054
Views: 13,665 - This ratio to comments is insane.
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 19:45,
archived)
Views: 13,665 - Impossible it's gone viral worldwide, plus the guy has 36,000 subscribers.
Text Comments: 2,054
Views: 13,665 - This ratio to comments is insane.

is to get people to comment on it?
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 19:49,
archived)

views - 13,665 to comments 2054 - so?
does there have to be a strict ratio figure before it passes from the realm of 'accepted true viewings' to 'suspected tampered viewing fiugures'?
And how 'viral' has this gone exactly? For my two penneth I've not seen or heard about it until now, and from what I've seen, you've only linked to it today on b3ta.
Show me proof that they doctor comments, or at the very least, give me a backed up evidential argument before
coming out with phrases that suggest you know for certain they do this.
Sources please fella - you know we like 'em :)
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 19:52,
archived)
does there have to be a strict ratio figure before it passes from the realm of 'accepted true viewings' to 'suspected tampered viewing fiugures'?
And how 'viral' has this gone exactly? For my two penneth I've not seen or heard about it until now, and from what I've seen, you've only linked to it today on b3ta.
Show me proof that they doctor comments, or at the very least, give me a backed up evidential argument before
coming out with phrases that suggest you know for certain they do this.
Sources please fella - you know we like 'em :)

you'll see the occasional video that has comments consisting of
person1: it's at 15325
person2: it's still at 15325
person3: wtf it's at 15325
person4: it's 15325...
for hundreds of people
some folk get twitchy when they see stuff like that
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 19:54,
archived)
person1: it's at 15325
person2: it's still at 15325
person3: wtf it's at 15325
person4: it's 15325...
for hundreds of people
some folk get twitchy when they see stuff like that

Youtube is life. Youtube is reason to get upset.
At. The. Internet.
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 19:56,
archived)
At. The. Internet.

I think that something selling itself as a great opt in community that basically is full of shit is what annoys people.
it doesn't matter if it's in print, online, or what someone told you in the pub if it's demonstrably full of crap people do have a right to get upset, but I guess if it's on the internet as it's just pretend, oh well guess it's not worthy of any kind of note at all.
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 20:03,
archived)
it doesn't matter if it's in print, online, or what someone told you in the pub if it's demonstrably full of crap people do have a right to get upset, but I guess if it's on the internet as it's just pretend, oh well guess it's not worthy of any kind of note at all.

at times for stats updating?
That doesn't necessarily mean they are holding it down....
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 20:00,
archived)
That doesn't necessarily mean they are holding it down....

Yes, that ratio is abnormal.
Plus several comments are being deleted on that very video, and not offensive ones.
Right, back to it.
( ,
Wed 3 Dec 2008, 19:55,
archived)
Plus several comments are being deleted on that very video, and not offensive ones.
Right, back to it.