
I know I'm alone in thinking this but the 2012 logo is pretty clever.
Fashion trends tend to go in 20 year cycles and so by 2012 they will be heavily influenced from the early 90's so it's more than possible that by then it will be fashionally up to date.
( ,
Sat 7 Feb 2009, 14:32,
archived)
Fashion trends tend to go in 20 year cycles and so by 2012 they will be heavily influenced from the early 90's so it's more than possible that by then it will be fashionally up to date.

makes it unforgivable.
( ,
Sat 7 Feb 2009, 14:33,
archived)

I'm worried.
( ,
Sat 7 Feb 2009, 14:35,
archived)

15-23 wanting to be part of the scene just before they were born/during early childhood, and thus recreate it.
I'm such an early 90s fan myself, and this is all I can put it down to.
( ,
Sat 7 Feb 2009, 14:37,
archived)
I'm such an early 90s fan myself, and this is all I can put it down to.

It's a lot down to what their parents were into then they were young as well.
( ,
Sat 7 Feb 2009, 14:48,
archived)

Think of the B52's
( ,
Sat 7 Feb 2009, 14:46,
archived)

Vaguely ironic retro-psychedelia was still fashionable in the 90s.
That's not the same thing as twenty year cycles.
In the 50s there were teds, who dressed in an Edwardian style, which is at least a 40 year gap.
( ,
Sat 7 Feb 2009, 15:01,
archived)
That's not the same thing as twenty year cycles.
In the 50s there were teds, who dressed in an Edwardian style, which is at least a 40 year gap.

Very influenced by the 70's. Today it is the 80's with undertones of the 60's.
( ,
Sat 7 Feb 2009, 15:04,
archived)

fashionable in the early 90s to have a logo that looked like a paraplegic falling from a multi-storey car park. I guess I was only young then though....
( ,
Sat 7 Feb 2009, 14:35,
archived)

and heavily over used.
( ,
Sat 7 Feb 2009, 14:38,
archived)