
That is why none of the CC cameras worked on 7/7, haha, they all malfunctioned at the same time, so now we have no videos of the "four bombers" doing their dirty work. Oh yea, don't forget that a drill was being run of bombers on trains with lots of people involved simulating terrorists
newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Soc/soc.culture.british/2006-07/msg00032.html
They wouldn't hurt us would they mommy?
.
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:45,
archived)
newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Soc/soc.culture.british/2006-07/msg00032.html
They wouldn't hurt us would they mommy?
.

but shortly after 7/7 I distinctly remember lots of cctv footage of the four suspects - on the day itself - on every available news channel going,
mainly showing the four suspects movements around the city and public transport system. I'm not doubting there 'may' be more behind it,
but to claim that all the cctv cameras went down on that day is unadulterated bollocks of the highest order
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:47,
archived)
mainly showing the four suspects movements around the city and public transport system. I'm not doubting there 'may' be more behind it,
but to claim that all the cctv cameras went down on that day is unadulterated bollocks of the highest order

They were all over the damn papers within two days of the bombings you idiot.
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:48,
archived)

The pictures of them were all over the media.
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:49,
archived)

And the face recognition software was what led them directly to the bombers house to arrest them.
As I said up there. It's easy to accept everything on the internet without doing any actual research but dangerous because most people spout nonsense in a bid for their 15 minutes of psuedo fame or respect of 'peers'
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:58,
archived)
As I said up there. It's easy to accept everything on the internet without doing any actual research but dangerous because most people spout nonsense in a bid for their 15 minutes of psuedo fame or respect of 'peers'

You saw stills of the four guys walking onto the train, did also know there was a drill being run by peter power involving lots people enacting a terror drill on the exact same trains, at the exact same time? If you investigated this 7/7 for ten minutes you would know the four guys were hired to be a part of the drill and used as the patsys, but you get your news from BBC, oh my god they would never lie to me would they mommy, get out of here with all this, you guys never investigate anything, you sit and wait for the news to show you what happened, and their version of events, admit it
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:16,
archived)

Cameras on buses rarely work. They are run by the private bus operators and cost money. They are meant to deceive and deter. The same is true of trains.
Cameras on the roads meant to trap speeders rarely work. They cost money and only are working on lucrative routes that are profitable ( ie. The A40 ).
There is nothing sinister about that. The local government funded and operated CCTV cameras were all working.
Reading between the lines is not investigation nor is any conclusion come to by such conjecture evidence of anything. It is merely a wish to invent a theory to support an idea.
Also looking glass news is not a reputable nor unbiased source of 'data'.
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:26,
archived)
Cameras on the roads meant to trap speeders rarely work. They cost money and only are working on lucrative routes that are profitable ( ie. The A40 ).
There is nothing sinister about that. The local government funded and operated CCTV cameras were all working.
Reading between the lines is not investigation nor is any conclusion come to by such conjecture evidence of anything. It is merely a wish to invent a theory to support an idea.
Also looking glass news is not a reputable nor unbiased source of 'data'.

well said 'nonic, it's about balance
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:29,
archived)

spread by people needing to fabricate plausible evidence to back up their implausible conclusions.
( ,
Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:21,
archived)