b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9367041 (Thread)

# .
Photobucket


Zombie eats cheerleaders brain
www.youtube.com/watch?v=27-N_mtx0GA

.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:20, archived)
# Quickly RUN!
The nano bots in the vapour trails will get you!
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:21, archived)
# You posted this video yesterday.
And we've seen this ridiculous conspiracy theory before too.
D-, must try harder.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:22, archived)
# chemtrails are nothing but a conspiracy hoax
they are only frozen water crystals! Just wanted to say i have changed my ways, and now I understand i was just being a fool paranoid, chemtrails are a natural occurance, whew, thanks gawd for b3ta for clearing that up for me.
/
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:27, archived)
# it's okay
... if you were really grateful you could pay for my vaccines
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:28, archived)
# I'm not sure that you
totally believe that but I hope that you do. There is plenty of real danger in the world to be genuinely concerned about ( deep packet inspection you bastards ) without accepting every, easily explainable conspiracy on the internet.
I bet even your friend Mr Icke has to, now and again, say to himself "hang on a minute, that really is a load of bollocks"
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:48, archived)
# It's not a hoax.
They clearly don't exist, learn the difference, and you'll need a fuck-load less therapy.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:58, archived)
# hello
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:22, archived)
# *runs about about flailing arms screaming 'they're all out to get us'*

Also: That plane needs some Redex through it's fuel.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:23, archived)
# oh my GOD - grunty's been compromised
they've got to him toooooo

*runs in the opposite direction*
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:25, archived)
# No, it was on the soundtrack of the film I was watching whilst using my noise-reduction
headphones IN FIRST FUCKING CLASS!

Eat my airmiles & carbon footprint Motherfucker*!

*Not you, Prof....
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:27, archived)
# *pauses* *confused*
HE'S TRYING TO CONFUSE US!

RUUUUUuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuunnnnnnn!

*runs, arms flailing wildly, into a wall*
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:29, archived)
# Funnily enough, there is a real (very small) risk from flying due to increased exposure to cosmic radiation.
But that's not as exciting as talking about governments killing us all.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:33, archived)
# The only risk is from keeling over from Kidney Failure having drank the bar dry.
LA - London = real risk of this.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:37, archived)
# Liver, dear boy. Liver.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:57, archived)
# That's already long gone, I'm running on back-up organs now.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:00, archived)
# Here's one for the consprationalists.
How did the Astronauts get through the Van Allen radiation belts with no adverse effects whilst travelling in what amounted to nothing more than a Campbell's soup tin with no radiation shielding (1)



(1)citation needed
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:55, archived)
# I was vaguely interested in that conspiracy.
I had a quick look and it seems most of the radiation is caused by alpha-emitters. A sheet of paper would be a fairly effective radiation shield against alpha particles.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:57, archived)
# don't let facts
get in the way of a good story ;)
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:01, archived)
# It doesn't matter, the moon is a conspiracy anyway.
It's designed to distract us from The Truth.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:04, archived)
# How do sir
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:26, archived)
# *waves*
Alreet?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:28, archived)
# i'm sick of these motherfucking skulls on this mtherfucking plane!
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:24, archived)
# ha ha ha
the franchise has limitless possibilities
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:25, archived)
# it does
i'd like to see drunken nuns on a plane, painting samuel l jackson in a combination of marmite, mayonnaise and peanut butter.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:28, archived)
# *endorses sentiment and subscribes to newsletter*
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:53, archived)
# it's a very sticky newsletter
this week's headline: "nutty nuns in marmite mayo madness"
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:56, archived)
# This will have to be the movie poster then
can you act?
.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:30, archived)
# not well
so I can probably do anything Nicholas Cage can do... also I have all my own hair
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:32, archived)
# I'm sick of this motherf*cking Aspartame in my Motherf*cking Drink
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:33, archived)
# no such thing,
what are you a nutjob, get out of here.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:38, archived)
# I don't touch the stuff personally :)
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:39, archived)
# Me neither.
Mostly because it tastes like shit. Give me the calories any day.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:40, archived)
# me me and thrice me.
The only thing wrong about aspartame is that it fucking awful. Give me full sugar any day and make sure you chop more rainforest down to plant it so I don't go without.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:52, archived)
# I can't be arsed, someone else do it then explain please.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:24, archived)
# Airplanes are killing us and birds can dance.
I'm not sure if these facts are related.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:25, archived)
# When if you're stupid enough to get hit by a plane, then you're
getting all you deserve.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:26, archived)
# No, the New World Order are loading them up with canisters of deadly chemicals
for some poorly explained reason.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:27, archived)
# "for some poorly explained reason"
pretty much sums it up.

:D
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:27, archived)
# I think they're trying to make money by killing us or something
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:29, archived)
# Wasn't that the original business model for the the U.S. Air Force?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:30, archived)
# I'm glad they've moved onto bringing fiery death to infidels now.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:35, archived)
# Well, after they got that venture capital start-up loan, it all turned round for them...
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:40, archived)
# Oh right, ignore me asking then.
I live in Rothschild country and I'm alright.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:28, archived)
# how are they killing us?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:27, archived)
# Shhhhh!
It's a secret. Damn.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:28, archived)
# They're actually saving us
by causing solar dimming
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:28, archived)
# ^ this
;-)
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:29, archived)
# wait a minute
THEY?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:31, archived)
# Your government adores you,
That is why none of the CC cameras worked on 7/7, haha, they all malfunctioned at the same time, so now we have no videos of the "four bombers" doing their dirty work. Oh yea, don't forget that a drill was being run of bombers on trains with lots of people involved simulating terrorists
newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Soc/soc.culture.british/2006-07/msg00032.html

They wouldn't hurt us would they mommy?
.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:45, archived)
# now I don't know about you,
but shortly after 7/7 I distinctly remember lots of cctv footage of the four suspects - on the day itself - on every available news channel going,
mainly showing the four suspects movements around the city and public transport system. I'm not doubting there 'may' be more behind it,
but to claim that all the cctv cameras went down on that day is unadulterated bollocks of the highest order
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:47, archived)
# Except we have plent of CCTV of the bombers
They were all over the damn papers within two days of the bombings you idiot.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:48, archived)
# That is utter bollocks.
The pictures of them were all over the media.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:49, archived)
# They filmed the whole thing up to and beyond it.
And the face recognition software was what led them directly to the bombers house to arrest them.
As I said up there. It's easy to accept everything on the internet without doing any actual research but dangerous because most people spout nonsense in a bid for their 15 minutes of psuedo fame or respect of 'peers'
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:58, archived)
# haha, that is a good one, they filmed everything!!! rolling here
You saw stills of the four guys walking onto the train, did also know there was a drill being run by peter power involving lots people enacting a terror drill on the exact same trains, at the exact same time? If you investigated this 7/7 for ten minutes you would know the four guys were hired to be a part of the drill and used as the patsys, but you get your news from BBC, oh my god they would never lie to me would they mommy, get out of here with all this, you guys never investigate anything, you sit and wait for the news to show you what happened, and their version of events, admit it
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:16, archived)
# one more thing
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:17, archived)
# Let me let you into a little secret about Britain.
Cameras on buses rarely work. They are run by the private bus operators and cost money. They are meant to deceive and deter. The same is true of trains.
Cameras on the roads meant to trap speeders rarely work. They cost money and only are working on lucrative routes that are profitable ( ie. The A40 ).
There is nothing sinister about that. The local government funded and operated CCTV cameras were all working.
Reading between the lines is not investigation nor is any conclusion come to by such conjecture evidence of anything. It is merely a wish to invent a theory to support an idea.

Also looking glass news is not a reputable nor unbiased source of 'data'.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:26, archived)
# Can I just add 'cameras not working in bus blown to buggery' shocker
well said 'nonic, it's about balance
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:29, archived)
# conjecture
spread by people needing to fabricate plausible evidence to back up their implausible conclusions.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:21, archived)
# 'Investigated' != read a bunch of websites run by nutters with similar delusions as me.
grow up, really.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:26, archived)
# is their ccctv
of the police buggering up the cameras?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:59, archived)
# ah, the chemtrails
I was wondering when you'd get around to that
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:24, archived)
# He's already done it once, the articles he posted were fabulous
Some things said vapour trails contain sedatives, others saying nano bots and none with any scientific evidence.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:28, archived)
# scientific evidence?
you don't need scientific evidence when you're in chemtrail cuckoo land...

I've just read your reply again... Nanobots?
Are you serious? :)
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:30, archived)
# it's not a big leap from
tubes to robots...
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:35, archived)
# yea, it could not have been both
Science tells me to relax and not to worry about the criss crossing trails, that is why i love science and hate conspiracy nuts, more time for my TV shows. Where is my remote?
.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:34, archived)
# What makes you trust internet conspiracy sites more than scientific literature?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:36, archived)
# A+++++ Would blindly follow again
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:37, archived)
# See I can accept the idea that some people might think 9/11 was dodgy
I can accept that some might question the collapse of building 7

I can see that the activities of certain corporate bigwigs may lead some to suspect conspiracy.

I can even see that the rather undemocratic self-serving sponsorship by corporations of US politians may be looked upon as a sinister controlling force.

But really, chemtrails? Really? It's almost as bad as lizards.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:40, archived)
# Wait...what? You hate conspiracy nuts?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:41, archived)
# I think he might be mocking our blind acceptance of the reasonable scientific explanation
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:42, archived)
# He's experimenting with 'sarcasm'
Though the idea that this nebulous 'science' is a sinister force shows a remarkable ignorance of science.

Mind you so does the idea of chemtrails.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:43, archived)
# Science is a fickle beast at times
Science can be adapted and bastardised to a personal viewpoint to show how the US Government was behind 9/11

However Science cannot be trusted in any form to logically explain Chemtrails.

That fickle, fickle science...
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:45, archived)
# I told you, i am converted!
Just because there are no photos of chemtrails taken before 1995, I am sure that they were actually crisscrossing the sky for decades, but no one thought to photograph them. Water crystals evaporate in less than a minute, chemtrails stay up and spread out over the sky for hours, leaving a milky haze, but i do not rely on my vision, i run to science to tell me nothing is wrong with this comparison, my father is a scientist, he touches me in all the bad places, but i like it.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:51, archived)
# I wonder when this was taken.
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/B-17_Flying_Fortress.jpg
Also, I'm pretty sure I've seen clouds (made of water vapour) stay in the sky for longer than a minute. Maybe I was mistaken.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:54, archived)
# Haha spot on
And add this nail to the coffin:

"The first published reports of contrails appeared during and shortly after World War I when aircraft were finally able to reach the altitudes required for contrail formation. An early example of contrail formation was observed during the flights of the pilot Zeno Diemer in 1919, when he reached altitudes as high as 30,500 ft above Munich, Germany. "
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:00, archived)
# jesus christ, i will have to remove my brain to cope with you guys
You don't know the difference between contrails and chemtrails? one disappears in a minute because it is frozen ice crystals, the other stays in sky for hours, and is a concoction of all sorts of chemicals and crap. But you never investigate it, you just sit and mastubate each other and giggle.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:30, archived)
# no, the time it takes a contrail to disappear depends on the humidity of the air
it doesn't always disappear quickly.
A simple piece of investigation will tell you this
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:41, archived)
# I think there's some truth in the 1995 thing
something to do with the introduction of a new kind of engine, like turbofans (randomly picked jargon word, may not in fact be turbofans).
Having said that, I remember seeing vapour trails a lot (particularly noticeable on summer days in a clear blue sky) when I was small, and I wasn't small in 1995.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:01, archived)
# Oh I'm sure that was photoshopped or something
after all, it doesn't fit with his theory.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:02, archived)
# jackoff
of course if is a contrail, it is ice crystals, it disappears because it only water vapor, but you are too ignorant to see the diff, get it?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:33, archived)
# If ever this was needed, it's now...
............................................________
....................................,.-‘”...................``~.,
.............................,.-”...................................“-.,
.........................,/...............................................”:,
.....................,?......................................................\,
.................../...........................................................,}
................./......................................................,:`^`..}
.............../...................................................,:”........./
..............?.....__.........................................:`.........../
............./__.(.....“~-,_..............................,:`........../
.........../(_....”~,_........“~,_....................,:`........_/
..........{.._$;_......”=,_.......“-,_.......,.-~-,},.~”;/....}
...........((.....*~_.......”=-._......“;,,./`..../”............../
...,,,___.\`~,......“~.,....................`.....}............../
............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-”
............/.`~,......`-...............................\....../\
.............\`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....\,__
,,_..........}.>-._\...................................|..............`=~-,
.....`=~-,_\_......`\,.................................\
...................`=~-,,.\,...............................\
................................`:,,...........................`\..............__
.....................................`=-,...................,%`--==``
........................................_\..........._,-%.......`\
...................................,<`.._|_,-&``................`\

(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:56, archived)
# How exactly
do water crystals evaporate so quickly at sub zero temperatures?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:56, archived)
# You're actually getting more incomprehensible over time.
'rely on my vision' = rely on my own prejudices and paranoia to draw conclusions on complex atmospheric phenomena?

'Water crystals evaporate in less than a minute' really? Now I'm pretty sure there are large number of atmospheric factors that may effect the length of time a contrail hangs about and the way it disperses, but i do not rely on my reasonable understanding of science, i run to PrisonPlanet to tell me everything is wrong with this comparison because I'm a paranoid fruitloop who wouldn't understand what the word 'evidence' meant if it was foceably downloaded into his brain by sinister government agents.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:00, archived)
# Come on David.
You need a bit more objection here.

Water crystals and water vapour do not evaporate in minutes. Have a look at the clouds.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:03, archived)
# are we talking about contrails or clouds?
contrails disappear in less than a minute, even in seconds, just like your breath on a cold day.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:38, archived)
# no they don't.
It depends upon the atmospheric conditions.
Contrails are the exhaust from the jet engine. Science 101 will tell you that this is water vapour leaving the engine which, at a few hundred feet behind the initial emission condenses into ice crystals and sits there like a cloud. Just like clouds if they are in a clear sky the sun will quickly burn them off. When it is cloudy you don't see them and they water vapour does not condense at lower altitudes and so you don't see them below the cloud layer. I'm a layman and all of this is perfectly understandable science.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 16:59, archived)
# Sorry, I'm getting to this party a little late but, what are Chemtrails?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:48, archived)
# All those airplane contrails you see in the sky
are actually chemicals or possibly nanobots or possibly something else.

They're being released as part of a huge conspiracy to rather inefficiently do something sinister to us by the gov'ment/military/NWO/terrorists/lizard people. No two nutwad sources agree.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:51, archived)
# So, basically something I need paid no further attention, to - yes?
Thanks for the heads-up.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:54, archived)
# 2/10 needs more Buffy
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:24, archived)
# Taste the rainbow!
*happy*
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:25, archived)
# Er...


Also, whats that dancing bird gotta do with zombies and cheerleaders? Is this meant to be a rickroll, without the Rick Astley?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:26, archived)
# Hahaha, good one, dumbass.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:26, archived)
# 16 points for that response, sir.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:28, archived)
# What flavour are these points?
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:32, archived)
# A Lime shell with liquid strawberry inside...
nom nom nom.
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:33, archived)
# Oh do want!
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:34, archived)
# Quick put your Aluminium hats on
also nice flick ;)
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:27, archived)
# aluminium?
swish bastard! just say tinfoil and have done with it!
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:30, archived)
# I'm DUTCH and NO Denmark is not the capital of Amsterdam
Foreign twat
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:44, archived)
# LOLVIRONMENT
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:27, archived)
# damn those cropsprayers:(
damn'em to HELL(i like my apples unsprayed please thank you )
(, Thu 16 Apr 2009, 15:33, archived)