b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9401420 (Thread)

# you should make a program that scans news headlines and then appropriately updates the image.
while factoring in the daily birth rate.

yup.

EDIT: *is pretty sure the death percentage would be falling constantly*
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:42, archived)
# just take a quick shuffty at the McKendrick von Foester equation.
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:44, archived)
# Why, are you trying to bore us to death?
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:44, archived)
# he likes playing with drills...?
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:46, archived)
# I think I will stomp off and feel unappreciated.
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:46, archived)
# Julia Gillard is again on her way to your place
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:48, archived)
# mmm delicious julia, I truly hope the red hair isn't dye.
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:50, archived)
# I'd like to look at the Colonel Sanders equation, which defines the amount of herbs and spices required when added to deep fried chicken
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:47, archived)
# There are 11 unknowns. And if there's only one equation the system can't be solved!!!
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:49, archived)
# There are known knowns.
These are things we know that we know.
There are known unknowns.
That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know.
But there are also unknown unknowns.
There are things we don't know we don't know.
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:50, archived)
# I thought for a sec that was yes minister, but unfortunately it was real
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:54, archived)
# Donald Rumsfeld
The man's a genious :)
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:55, archived)
# It is actually an interesting point
in that we can't predict what future knowledge is going to be - obviously, otherwise we'd already have it - and yet we can somehow know what type of information it is that we're trying to find out. Whatever that means.
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 13:05, archived)
# There is some good commentary in
wikipedia.

We do our best to "know what type of information it is that we're trying to find out", but that meta-knowledge is itself something we continually struggle to find out. I suppose that's why prototyping is such a successful strategy.
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 13:39, archived)
# Ha
Marvelous.
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 13:52, archived)
# It is scarily similar to a scene in Yes, Minister
EDIT:
The fact that you needed to know was not known at the time that the now known need to know was known, and therefore those that needed to advise and inform the Home Secretary perhaps felt that the information that he needed as to whether to inform the highest authority of the known information was not yet known, and therefore there was no authority for the authority to be informed because the need to know was not, at that time, known or needed.
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:57, archived)
# *claps*
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 13:07, archived)
# If this was Jane Austen, it would, eventually, make sense.
(And more: the words chosen would approximately be both necessary and sufficient).
But try as I might, I can't unravel that! [Edit: I mean, it doesn't seem to make sense without some further context]
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 13:20, archived)
# im amazed that this 'global epidemic' has actually
provide proper news, rather than some vague celebrity pish like that suzanne bint did a fart that sounded like an angel, or becks gets a new pair of socks.
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:52, archived)
# SUZANNE BINT DID A FART THAT CONTAINED FLU VIRUS
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:54, archived)
# What?
New socks for Becks? When?
(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:55, archived)
# the news loves anything that they can get self important about
WE GIVE YOU THE FACTS THAT HELP YOU TO STAY ALIVE!!!

(, Tue 28 Apr 2009, 12:55, archived)