

So this would be TOAM one would assume.

They sort of split a bit. One below worked better.
Eyes are shit on that though. I'm still working on
what gets the best results.
( ,
Sun 10 May 2009, 7:50,
archived)
Eyes are shit on that though. I'm still working on
what gets the best results.

Is it the same technique that allows people to make those awesome double pictures that produce a 3D effect? I love them.
( ,
Sun 10 May 2009, 7:51,
archived)

Setup a morph between the left and right versions.
Takes a bit of effort to layout the nodes, but the
results are quite interesting. Thx.
( ,
Sun 10 May 2009, 7:54,
archived)
Takes a bit of effort to layout the nodes, but the
results are quite interesting. Thx.

Serious business!
Those "inmagine" pics are such a fucking laugh.

( ,
Sun 10 May 2009, 7:58,
archived)
Those "inmagine" pics are such a fucking laugh.



I have a bunch more collected for later use.

I guess you were referring to what I call stock people


www.inmagine.com/
Some of the stuff they have is truly nuts.
( ,
Sun 10 May 2009, 8:43,
archived)
Some of the stuff they have is truly nuts.

Site's rather slow here, but I'll have a look around for some nutty flavoured inspiration
( ,
Sun 10 May 2009, 8:50,
archived)

It's not showing me any pictures at all. Just redexes where their stock photos are supposed to be. Rest of the site images (logo etc.) are fine.
( ,
Sun 10 May 2009, 8:52,
archived)