![[challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif "Challenge Entry: MOCK THE POLITICIANS AND WIN A LAPTOP"){kind=small}
From the MOCK THE POLITICIANS AND WIN A LAPTOP challenge. See all 522 entries (closed)
(, Sat 15 Aug 2009, 19:14, archived)
shut the fuck up you fucking ignorant dick cheese.He runs it because he is a member of the labour party, who the country voted for in 1997. He's not an imbecile, he's the guy stuck with a whole lot of shit that he wasn't responsible for. He's the patsy here.
However, more importantly for the ignorant masses, he also can't play the media game to well which is apparently far more important.
edit: I mean HAHAHAHGORDON CLOWN MORE LIKE!!!!1
(,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 19:22,
archived)
However, more importantly for the ignorant masses, he also can't play the media game to well which is apparently far more important.
edit: I mean HAHAHAHGORDON CLOWN MORE LIKE!!!!1
Traditional Florida Acidedit: ninjas noticed.
(
discomeats This canoe,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 19:27,
archived)
Oooh good noobpoint (despite the trolling)He also kickstarted elimination of third world debt which people tend not to remember.
( Bela Lugosi's Dad,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 19:25,
archived)
penis brieI think its safe to say as Chancellor of the Exchequer and then PM, he is more than a little responsible for the banking circle jerk that dumped us in this current shit pile.
(,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 19:26,
archived)
No he isn'tHe didn't invent sub-prime mortgage lending.
( Bela Lugosi's Dad,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 19:28,
archived)
He was happy to sit back and enjoy the resultant house price boom though.It's not all his fault and hindsight is fantastic, but I certainly wouldn't call him blameless.
(
my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 19:36,
archived)
AS one eyed gits who cocked up our economy long before he ended up being in charge to "save the world" hes doing SHITE!The bloke is a caretaker primeminsiter, he wont be remembered for a thing! he's a complete none entity who won't calll a general election because he knows he will be out on his arse!
(
tim1701 I have no board signature!!!!!,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 19:29,
archived)
wtf are you babbling on aboutwhy the fuck should he call an election just because you want him to.
(,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 19:39,
archived)
There's certainly an argument for calling an election so the winners can deal with various problems while thinking about beyond a years time.Fuck all incentive for him to call it though, because his party is likely to get mauled.
( my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 19:41,
archived)
IT s not becaue i want him to, its because i believe in DEMOCRACY!He will probably be our only prime minister to both gain and loose the status without a single public vote, and that is just WRONG!
P.S. babble implies something incomprehensible and senseless! there is rhyme and reason to my point, babble sir is what you are doing in your mothers knickers in a corner rocking back and forth forever sucking your thumb!......... wow thats from a dark page in my mind! lol! I HATE EVERYONE EQUALY!
(P.S. babble implies something incomprehensible and senseless! there is rhyme and reason to my point, babble sir is what you are doing in your mothers knickers in a corner rocking back and forth forever sucking your thumb!......... wow thats from a dark page in my mind! lol! I HATE EVERYONE EQUALY!
tim1701 I have no board signature!!!!!,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 20:33,
archived)
Did you vote for Tony Blair as Prime Minister then?
Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 20:34,
archived)
No but i did vote for labour with him in place as the leader of the party,however i have since changed aligiance
( tim1701 I have no board signature!!!!!,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 20:37,
archived)
As a result of Gordon Brown being leader of the party? Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 20:38,
archived)
no it was before that during the build up to the gulf conflict tim1701 I have no board signature!!!!!,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 20:39,
archived)
Oh ok.So your issue is not with Gordon Brown, it is with Tony Blair.
( Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 20:50,
archived)
No,My issues is with a party that has dragged us into a needless war, dug us into debt and at the momement is borrowing for a quick fix that will leave the next elected party with massive national debt, please dont make assumtions without the facts... Remember Brown is responsible for the current financial fall out form 3 disasterous budgets.... A lot of people forget that the mess he is cleaning up he created himself on an awfull lot of fronts.
( tim1701 I have no board signature!!!!!,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 20:55,
archived)
you're just inventing things to be angry about.It is normal for the government to choose when to call an election, and it would be pretty fucking stupid to call it when everyone is being all pissy 'because your smile is a bit funny like.' This is what I meant by 'you wanting him to.' You clearly dont want him in the job despite the fact that there is nothing wrong with it no matter what you think, and seem to think it would be somehow "right" for him to deliberately call an election at a bad time for the labour party, so that your favourite but inept and hypocritical tory party can have a few years in and fuck up the country good and proper.
What's funny/sad&pathetic is, there are essentially 2 broad groups of things that gordon brown has taken heavy flak for from the tory party. The most flak has been taken for the policies that are actually closest to what the fecking tories would have done themselves, but they bitch about it just because it wasnt them doing it and they realise people are too dull to realise this and will love to have a go. The other category are things that either needed to be done, or where actually just good ideas, that were practical solutions to difficult problems and were better than anyone else had come up with, not just in britain but other countries too. For these ideas he was mocked simply for being a bit awkward in some unrelated incidents that happened at around the same time.
As for not making assumptions without facts, are you in the cabinet or high up in the security services or something? You appear pretty confident claiming the government dragged us into a needless war. I think it's a bit different when you're the guy who has to make a decision like that. Further I would hardly call the current borrowing a quick fix, and nobody, including the tories had a better idea. Finally, stop being so small minded referring to how the 'next elected party' will be in debt like it is all some kind of game. I strongly suspect Gordon Brown is more concerned with the debt the COUNTRY will be in than how much debt cameron will have to work with.
(,
Sun 16 Aug 2009, 1:27,
archived)
What's funny/sad&pathetic is, there are essentially 2 broad groups of things that gordon brown has taken heavy flak for from the tory party. The most flak has been taken for the policies that are actually closest to what the fecking tories would have done themselves, but they bitch about it just because it wasnt them doing it and they realise people are too dull to realise this and will love to have a go. The other category are things that either needed to be done, or where actually just good ideas, that were practical solutions to difficult problems and were better than anyone else had come up with, not just in britain but other countries too. For these ideas he was mocked simply for being a bit awkward in some unrelated incidents that happened at around the same time.
As for not making assumptions without facts, are you in the cabinet or high up in the security services or something? You appear pretty confident claiming the government dragged us into a needless war. I think it's a bit different when you're the guy who has to make a decision like that. Further I would hardly call the current borrowing a quick fix, and nobody, including the tories had a better idea. Finally, stop being so small minded referring to how the 'next elected party' will be in debt like it is all some kind of game. I strongly suspect Gordon Brown is more concerned with the debt the COUNTRY will be in than how much debt cameron will have to work with.
Very bold and forthrightYou tell us
(
Jahled Three shades of black,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 20:45,
archived)
the irony of having a grammatical error in an image accusing someone of being an imbecile is not lost on me...
(,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 19:24,
archived)
Missing comma, also, "an".Also, another missing comma.
( Redsushi! Whoop! Whoop! Yes, that one!,
Sat 15 Aug 2009, 20:33,
archived)