

But I stand by my original statement
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 10:23,
archived)

Satan ("The Devil") was a creation to help justify the existance of God. The acts of murder were in the name of the latter. Love thy Nietzsche
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 10:27,
archived)

How are you seeing it? Must be an act of SATAN? or God?
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 10:40,
archived)

They took my words and rearranged them a little. ;)
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 10:45,
archived)

Hence the hooves and goat legs.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 10:30,
archived)

you can't be 'anti-christ' unless you believe in him in some way.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 10:32,
archived)

But if they are killing anyone, they are not doing it in the name of God, but rather Satan, as my original statement suggests.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 10:35,
archived)

are not necessarily the same figure unless you've been raised in Christian dogma. So far as I'm aware -- and as a self-important, pretty stupid prick, I may be very wrong -- Lucifer as we think of him is a Christian development. Beelzebub is adapted from Baal and so would be Old Testament but I've no idea whether his blending with the Prince of Hell would be Christian or not (well, probably, since Hell is also a product of Christian dogma), while Satan drank whisky and gambled with God in between bouts of walking the Earth and going up and down on it, whatever that's meant to mean, and is a bona fide Jewish character who isn't actually the great opponent and Lord of Darkness but is instead only as much of a cunt as God Himself.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 10:47,
archived)