pig nose pie
From the Frankenstein Foods challenge. See all 295 entries (closed)
( , Sat 19 Dec 2009, 21:28, archived)
always a bit moist on the inside
From the Frankenstein Foods challenge. See all 295 entries (closed)
( , Sat 19 Dec 2009, 21:28, archived)
wow
Could you make it BIGGER
looking from the moon it isnt quite big enough
( ,
Sat 19 Dec 2009, 21:30,
archived)
looking from the moon it isnt quite big enough
?
this is a reply to all three above -- has he made it smaller? sure, it's 115 whole K, but i've seen worse go by on here without comment, and it doesn't look too big on my screen.
it *is* disgusting, of course, but i celebrate that. :)
( ,
Sat 19 Dec 2009, 21:34,
archived)
it *is* disgusting, of course, but i celebrate that. :)
We wouldn't care, but the previous 200+k 1000+pixel height picture has got us riled up.
( ,
Sat 19 Dec 2009, 21:36,
archived)
WHY IS THIS HAPPENING?
Did Mu do this to you, Mofaha? Did he? You have to tell me.
( ,
Sat 19 Dec 2009, 22:00,
archived)
???
200+k 1000+pixel height ???
I think there is something wrong with your browser Mr Riled Up
( ,
Sat 19 Dec 2009, 21:40,
archived)
I think there is something wrong with your browser Mr Riled Up
Now I'm lost and confused
But I've no issue with Mr Zoid's picture, which I clicked quite happily. And the one you link to is now a sane size, although this appears to be after some certain coercion :(
( ,
Sat 19 Dec 2009, 22:01,
archived)
You sir!
While I might not fully agree with what you have to say, I will defend to the death your right to say it.*
/karma whore
*just kidding, I don't really give a shit how big things are on here
( ,
Sat 19 Dec 2009, 21:39,
archived)
/karma whore
*just kidding, I don't really give a shit how big things are on here
if every pic was 115k
id use my 2gb limit up in err umm not very long altho i have no idea what 115k/2gb means
( ,
Sat 19 Dec 2009, 21:45,
archived)
I go through the occasional period
of being snappy and petty at people posting files that are 115k when without a significant loss of quality they could be 49k. We posted 50k images for years without struggling to much and I find it very hard to believe that superior software and advanced processors have suddenly lost the ability to employ exactly the same algorithms to compress below 50k, and that most of the time it's chiefly laziness.
Then I look at what I'm actually typing and find more important things to worry about. If I weren't such a hypocrite I'd even make sure my pictures were all 50k and below, but I'm a right hypocrite so mine tend to be about 99k...
( ,
Sat 19 Dec 2009, 22:04,
archived)
Then I look at what I'm actually typing and find more important things to worry about. If I weren't such a hypocrite I'd even make sure my pictures were all 50k and below, but I'm a right hypocrite so mine tend to be about 99k...
Hey you just posted 700bytes of words. You owe me significantly now.
( ,
Sat 19 Dec 2009, 22:07,
archived)