in both integrity and morals.
(,
Wed 13 Jan 2010, 9:07,
archived)
that allows for choice only to be made from those main parties who all offer the same fare - if you voted outside of the 2 main parties you vote with your consciousness but that doesn't make any odds whatsoever as you know it won't change anything. Apathy is the growing consensus and the sooner Politicians take note of the massive amount of people not voting then they will finally be aware their politics have become more of an Oligarchy than a Democracy!
/steps down from soapbox
(,
Wed 13 Jan 2010, 9:13,
archived)
/steps down from soapbox
If anything things have improved.. to quote Blackadder, "Democracy isn't fair. Take Manchester: population 600000; electoral roll 3"
(,
Wed 13 Jan 2010, 9:17,
archived)
Now it's all Banker Class - so it hasn't improved for the majority of us.
(,
Wed 13 Jan 2010, 9:24,
archived)
Twats
Chavs
Us
(,
Wed 13 Jan 2010, 9:27,
archived)
Chavs
Us
but it's only been Lab/Lib/Con for the past 100 odd years, for a very long time it was only Lib/Con. In the lifeline of democracy in the UK, the working classes had genuine political representationon only very briefly , before Labour was taken over by the professional middle classes.
But I do agree with you, something's got to give. IMO, we need electoral reform urgently.
(,
Wed 13 Jan 2010, 9:34,
archived)
But I do agree with you, something's got to give. IMO, we need electoral reform urgently.
2) If you mean PR, it makes every government a coalition and everything becomes even more centrist. Everybody is essentially always in power, at least a bit. If you mean direct democracy, see (1). Which is not to say that indirect democracy makes any sense, but it's a system under which bastards get power and then you hurl abuse at them for decade or so and vote them out in favour of different bastards who appear nicer, and as such is better than a system (and I mean proportional representation as well as direct democracy) without anybody specific to complain at. At least under the current system somebody has to be a bit creative to get in power.
Ideally nobody (rather than everybody) would have the power.
(,
Wed 13 Jan 2010, 10:12,
archived)
Ideally nobody (rather than everybody) would have the power.
slides down a big snowy hill on it shouting "You'll never take me alive copper!"
it's apathy with the public
We have a system in place which ACN change the political make up of the country, but people choose not to make the leap.
The London mayor election was a great example fot his. People voted in Boris because they were bored with ken, without giving a second thought to any other candidate.
(,
Wed 13 Jan 2010, 9:47,
archived)
We have a system in place which ACN change the political make up of the country, but people choose not to make the leap.
The London mayor election was a great example fot his. People voted in Boris because they were bored with ken, without giving a second thought to any other candidate.