wouldnt be a bad trade of if the parents can provide a better education than the state
at the cost of injecting toxic chemicals into a child.
but with all the arguments and disimformation that is around from both sides shouldnt the parents be the ones who ultimatly make that choice?
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:41, Reply)
at the cost of injecting toxic chemicals into a child.
but with all the arguments and disimformation that is around from both sides shouldnt the parents be the ones who ultimatly make that choice?
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:41, Reply)
Toxic Chemicals?! FFS.
With arguments and disinformation like that, the parents should probably be the last ones to make the choice.
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:46, Reply)
With arguments and disinformation like that, the parents should probably be the last ones to make the choice.
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:46, Reply)
Arguments and disinformation from both sides?
It's not a finely balanced debate. It's not a debate at all. There's no evidence for MMR being dangerous, and certainly not more dangerous than the illnesses against which it protects.
Google is not a reliable academic source, fluff.
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:47, Reply)
It's not a finely balanced debate. It's not a debate at all. There's no evidence for MMR being dangerous, and certainly not more dangerous than the illnesses against which it protects.
Google is not a reliable academic source, fluff.
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:47, Reply)
I suspect every one of those parents had all of their shots
A level of immunisation is necessary to provide protection for all - in all of the areas where there were outbreaks earlier this year all of a sudden those parents decided that they perhaps should get their kids immunised - shame it took some serious illnesses and permanent damage to occur before they got round to it.
There never was any credible peer-reviewed evidence of any link between the MMR jab and autism. Plenty of evidence that the (now former) doctor who claimed the link was in the pay of some lawyers who were suing drug-companies though
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:49, Reply)
A level of immunisation is necessary to provide protection for all - in all of the areas where there were outbreaks earlier this year all of a sudden those parents decided that they perhaps should get their kids immunised - shame it took some serious illnesses and permanent damage to occur before they got round to it.
There never was any credible peer-reviewed evidence of any link between the MMR jab and autism. Plenty of evidence that the (now former) doctor who claimed the link was in the pay of some lawyers who were suing drug-companies though
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:49, Reply)
Was that the doctor who was subsequently struck off?
For doing overly invasive tests on kids, some of them without informed parental consent?
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:52, Reply)
For doing overly invasive tests on kids, some of them without informed parental consent?
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:52, Reply)
Wakefield - fucking waste of sperm
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8700611.stm
Apparently he's a bit of a hero for the right wing conspiraloons in the US now
Sadly
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:54, Reply)
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8700611.stm
Apparently he's a bit of a hero for the right wing conspiraloons in the US now
Sadly
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:54, Reply)
Yup, that's the one.
You do him too much credit though; someone clearly pissed in his mum.
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:59, Reply)
You do him too much credit though; someone clearly pissed in his mum.
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:59, Reply)
Oh FFS, go do some reading.
There is a whole battery of information out there demonstrating that they're perfectly safe to use for the vast, vast majority of people, and that the odds of you being harmed by the jab are orders of magnitude lower than the odds of you being seriously harmed by the disease.
I'm all for freedom of choice, but freedom of choice based upon incomplete, biased, or willfully misleading information is no choice at all.
Calling them "toxic" just shows your ignorance of the issues involved.
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:54, Reply)
There is a whole battery of information out there demonstrating that they're perfectly safe to use for the vast, vast majority of people, and that the odds of you being harmed by the jab are orders of magnitude lower than the odds of you being seriously harmed by the disease.
I'm all for freedom of choice, but freedom of choice based upon incomplete, biased, or willfully misleading information is no choice at all.
Calling them "toxic" just shows your ignorance of the issues involved.
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:54, Reply)
not ignorant of the subject just useing the arguments for and against
one camps calls it safe one camp calls it toxic who to believe?
studys conducted by biased studdy groups funded by the very companys that they are trialing or the fear mongers who want any and all vacinations to be provved safe by independant and transparent means?
to many times the industry influences the out come of studys in there favour is it any wonder people dont trust what the goverment and says?
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 17:18, Reply)
one camps calls it safe one camp calls it toxic who to believe?
studys conducted by biased studdy groups funded by the very companys that they are trialing or the fear mongers who want any and all vacinations to be provved safe by independant and transparent means?
to many times the industry influences the out come of studys in there favour is it any wonder people dont trust what the goverment and says?
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 17:18, Reply)
What's the point in arguing with you?
If you're just going to airily dismiss any evidence of safety as evidence of conspiracy then you're just wasting everyone's time here.
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 17:43, Reply)
If you're just going to airily dismiss any evidence of safety as evidence of conspiracy then you're just wasting everyone's time here.
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 17:43, Reply)
Probably just trolling.
I mean proper trolling, not briefing. The Beeb consistently conflates these.
It would explain why "ignore" is in purple for that guy.
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 22:47, Reply)
I mean proper trolling, not briefing. The Beeb consistently conflates these.
It would explain why "ignore" is in purple for that guy.
( , Sat 12 Oct 2013, 22:47, Reply)
I've read this thread and have concluded that you are a fucking idiot.
( , Sun 13 Oct 2013, 19:53, Reply)
( , Sun 13 Oct 2013, 19:53, Reply)