I'm voting based on my limiting understanding of economics.
Your sweeping statement that the issue is solely based on racism, and the majority of those voting out are racists, is a patronising load of shit. You may have written about broader issues later, but TL:DR. The first few paragraphs appear woefully ill-informed, and as you acknowledge very biased.
You write "There is nothing so dangerous as an ill-informed voter" - well it looks like "From a place of ignorance" is an apposite title for your tawdry rag.
Go back to lurking.
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 11:59, Share, Reply)
Your sweeping statement that the issue is solely based on racism, and the majority of those voting out are racists, is a patronising load of shit. You may have written about broader issues later, but TL:DR. The first few paragraphs appear woefully ill-informed, and as you acknowledge very biased.
You write "There is nothing so dangerous as an ill-informed voter" - well it looks like "From a place of ignorance" is an apposite title for your tawdry rag.
Go back to lurking.
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 11:59, Share, Reply)
I read the whole thing. You really didn't miss anything. Ill informed sweeping generalisations, and a massive over-simplification of the history of Europe.
I'm voting IN, but it makes me ashamed to be on the same side as sucha cock as this bloke.
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 13:27, Share, Reply)
I'm voting IN, but it makes me ashamed to be on the same side as sucha cock as this bloke.
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 13:27, Share, Reply)
You're sweet to say so.
I'm genuinely pleased that you think that to say I gave a "massive over-simplification of the history of Europe" is a criticism, considering the lead in to that section is: "With the clarification that this is massively simplified". Thanks for reading!
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 15:10, Share, Reply)
I'm genuinely pleased that you think that to say I gave a "massive over-simplification of the history of Europe" is a criticism, considering the lead in to that section is: "With the clarification that this is massively simplified". Thanks for reading!
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 15:10, Share, Reply)
Well...
It's reflecting that many people do see the issue in such a way (I've since added in a clarification that I disagree to make it clearer to those who may misinterpret it, though, so thanks!)
You may also have missed the red text that comes up when you click "reply".
I also wonder whether I should make it clear that I'm not British? Damned foreigners, coming over here, writing things...
Also, B3ta isn't exactly the place for an intricate political debate (which the article isn't and I know it isn't), it's a place for knob gags and fun, so we can all calm down and have a cuppa.
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 13:57, Share, Reply)
It's reflecting that many people do see the issue in such a way (I've since added in a clarification that I disagree to make it clearer to those who may misinterpret it, though, so thanks!)
You may also have missed the red text that comes up when you click "reply".
I also wonder whether I should make it clear that I'm not British? Damned foreigners, coming over here, writing things...
Also, B3ta isn't exactly the place for an intricate political debate (which the article isn't and I know it isn't), it's a place for knob gags and fun, so we can all calm down and have a cuppa.
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 13:57, Share, Reply)
Reflecting?
Buy a dictionary.
And if b3ta isn't a place for 'intricate' (it's not necessarily wrong, but it is a poor choice of adjective) political debate, why did you post your adolescent musings on a political issue here?
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 15:48, Share, Reply)
Buy a dictionary.
And if b3ta isn't a place for 'intricate' (it's not necessarily wrong, but it is a poor choice of adjective) political debate, why did you post your adolescent musings on a political issue here?
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 15:48, Share, Reply)
Do you really have a mind of your own?
Because this is a copy paste of a cooment made by someone else and I've addressed it. Calm down, and thanks for "your" contribution!
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 15:52, Share, Reply)
Because this is a copy paste of a cooment made by someone else and I've addressed it. Calm down, and thanks for "your" contribution!
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 15:52, Share, Reply)
I know right?
What kind of cunt would copy and paste the same reply twice in a single thread?
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 15:59, Share, Reply)
What kind of cunt would copy and paste the same reply twice in a single thread?
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 15:59, Share, Reply)
I would say, rather gently:
That posting your own comment again from your own account in answer to the same issues is fine, but if it comes from a different account it's a different issue (would you like it if somebody copied your painting and passed it off as their own?).
Anyhow, I'm sure you've got to be angry elsewhere too, so thanks for commenting!
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 17:36, Share, Reply)
That posting your own comment again from your own account in answer to the same issues is fine, but if it comes from a different account it's a different issue (would you like it if somebody copied your painting and passed it off as their own?).
Anyhow, I'm sure you've got to be angry elsewhere too, so thanks for commenting!
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 17:36, Share, Reply)
So, my comment doesn't even warrant an individual reply? You just cut and paste your response to Prufrock?
You lazy bastard.
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 18:17, Share, Reply)
You lazy bastard.
( , Wed 15 Jun 2016, 18:17, Share, Reply)