strong contender for the most punchable face of the year award
If he ever went near a warzone he'd split his trousers then shit himself within five minutes
(, Fri 25 Jan 2019, 14:29, Reply)
the fat shed's wiki page is a joy to behold
'War studies MA'
'Territorial Army'
'Briefly married'
I cant think of a more tragic character in parliament right now
(, Fri 25 Jan 2019, 14:40, Reply)
Article on his expenses claims / gratuitous plug for pepperami
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5431750/MPs-expenses-Mark-Francois-A-bit-of-an-animal.html
(
hoppitygoestotown The temporal displacement occurred exactly, Fri 25 Jan 2019, 14:55,
Reply)
No wonder he reasons like a 3 year old, he also eats like one.
(
DinivanX Has stinging piss after drinking Pact Coffee, Fri 25 Jan 2019, 15:59,
Reply)
I wonder what Rees Mogg would eat if he didn't have a wife and servants
(, Fri 25 Jan 2019, 16:10, Reply)
Lol.
That man got bullied by a polite letter. I hope he can recover from the trauma.
(, Fri 25 Jan 2019, 14:51, Reply)
Suspect he was bullied quite badly at school which is where all this comes from
(, Fri 25 Jan 2019, 15:48, Reply)
What leap of logic makes you see that as a threat?
"If it becomes inconvenient and expensive for me to do business here I'll do it elsewhere where it's easier and cheaper."
That's not a threat, that's standard business practice.
What if they do leave... would you describe that as an attack?
(, Fri 25 Jan 2019, 18:17, Reply)
Mate, Airbus has fuck all to do with business practice.
Airbus is an old political agreement between Britain and France.
Do you really think they make wings in Britain and then fly them over at great expense to the assembly line in France because it is good business practice?
(
Tusk knows where you live, Fri 25 Jan 2019, 18:42,
Reply)
And yet they still manage to be competitive against Boeing.
(
wheresthefish Partly filled with wrong, Fri 25 Jan 2019, 19:25,
Reply)
Airbus has a vastly more complicated history than that.
And those old agreements are completely irrelevant and out of date, much like 80% of the leaver's arguments. If it's not cost effective to transport parts between the two countries before Brexit, how cost effective do you think it's likely to be afterwards?
If it turns out that Airbus do leave the country after all, will it still have been a threat, or will it turn out to have been a warning of exactly what they planned to do all along?
(, Fri 25 Jan 2019, 20:33, Reply)
