
it's just bollocks. Anyone who gets upset at the mere sight of a testicle needs to grow up. Unless he's doing some harm to someone he can dress as he likes, or not.
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 17:13, Reply)

will I start finding the sight of bare ankles indecent as well?
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 17:20, Reply)

would you really want to get the tube with a load of naked men with semis?
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 17:27, Reply)

so it's all about social norms, is it. should the law uphold all social norms?
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 17:30, Reply)

if not the current (well probably slightly out of date what with the slow pace of legislative change) social norms codified into a set of rules for people to follow?
hence men fucking one another in the bumhole being previously illegal but now legal. or a gentleman beating/raping ones wife being once legal but now illegal.
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 17:36, Reply)

and those other things?
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 17:37, Reply)

Or, let me put this another way, is this what you say, that if society at large is homophobic, that homophobia should be enshrined in law? And sexism, and misogyny and racism, all those other things that we're glad aren't tolerated anymore.
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 17:43, Reply)

i've been socialised into THE CURRENT SOCIAL NORM so i would think that wouldn't i?
edit:ooft on my spelling.
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 17:46, Reply)

Jeepers mister.
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 18:14, Reply)

That is why we have laws with terms like "public indecency". The idea of what is indecent is constantly changing and this way a good judge can interpret the law in tune with current values.
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 17:41, Reply)

as social norms do. possibly partly cos of activism of teh naked ramblers type of activism.
i'm not arguing that wearing clothes is right or wrong, just that it's a social norm and if you deviate from a social norm you will often be breaking the law and should expect the consequences. the naked rambler does expect it. i think he has a better handle on the situation than moon girl.
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 17:42, Reply)

but I do not believe that the purpose of the law is to uphold conformity to social norms, it is to protect vulnerable people from harm.
I don't believe that wandering around naked is wrong or that it does anybody any harm and I fully support anyone's right to do it if they wish. If society has a problem with that, society has to justify it.
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 17:47, Reply)

I think I agree with this man
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Dworkin
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 18:47, Reply)

( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 19:03, Reply)

I got the Wikipedia article on Law but I clicked through some links.
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 19:08, Reply)

what a surprise.
look i'm not a super mainstream person and i think that a naked dude isn;t doing me any harm but i'm not everyone and it seems like the general consensus (in society rather than on b3ta) is that people ought to keep their clothes on. are you able to see that?
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 19:14, Reply)

the definition is:
Law is a system of rules and guidelines which are enforced through social institutions to govern behavior.[3] Laws are made by governments, specifically by their legislatures. The formation of laws themselves may be influenced by a constitution (written or unwritten) and the rights encoded therein. The law shapes politics, economics and society in countless ways and serves as a social mediator of relations between people.
Nowhere is law defined as "social norms", do point me to the paragraph you are referring to. I hope you aren't misunderstanding the term "normative". If you look that up you will get back to Dworkin again.
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 19:24, Reply)

with the law then they should just break it anyway, rather than campaign to change it?
There are plenty of naturist places to go if you want to walk around in the nip. This guy is just an attention seeking moron.
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 18:59, Reply)

Well it depends on the law, I think. There are some things that the law, to my mind, simply has no right to forbid. I've spoken to plenty of people who take this line on recreational drugs, in fact I've had these conversations on B3ta.
Maybe there should be a campaign to change it, because it's a silly law, but it's also a fairly trivial issue that not many people care about, I guess.
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 19:16, Reply)

On the tube he should probably wear clothes. On Bodmin Moor, I'd probably leave him to it.
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 17:50, Reply)

if it was me i'd leave him to it on the tube too but i'm not everyone and i have to respect other people's views. anything for the quiet life.
( , Fri 20 Jul 2012, 17:59, Reply)