I want one though. Looks amazing but bonkers. Nice find
(, Thu 27 May 2021, 1:00, Reply)
I've seen photos of that before but not footage of it flying. I wonder what the pilot's reaction was when he first saw it!
(, Thu 27 May 2021, 7:07, Reply)
The rudder and elevator are mainly in the airflow of the ducted fan. Great when the engine is delivering power, less so when it isn’t. It means that your flight controls will have varying (and not easily predictable) effects based on throttle position.
Add to that a proportionally large side area, which would make it excessively sensitive to crosswinds, and it must have been an absolute pig to land. When you’re low and slow over the runway and you chop the throttle to idle you’ll immediately lose most of your control authority in both pitch and yaw. Any wind gusts at that point and you’ll be in the grass. Dirty side down if you’re lucky.
(, Thu 27 May 2021, 9:22, Reply)
It looks very like most of the control is at the rear rather than balanced with the wings. Steering from the rear doesn't bode well for many vehicles.
(, Thu 27 May 2021, 13:21, Reply)
Expect some James Randi clips to show up in your feed shortly.
(, Thu 27 May 2021, 19:26, Reply)
Apparently that was a bastard to fly.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granville_Gee_Bee_Model_R_Super_Sportster
(, Thu 27 May 2021, 13:32, Reply)
I love the idea of that thing. Take the biggest fuckoff engine you can get and add just enough aerodynamics to allow it to fly.
Wouldn't want to fly it myself though.
(, Thu 27 May 2021, 15:19, Reply)
Relatedly: The F-4 Phantom was said to prove the aerodynamic principle that with enough power you can fly a brick.
(, Thu 27 May 2021, 15:35, Reply)