
Yup, somebody's actually posted the entire "worst movie in cinema history"
on YouTube, just thought I'd pass it on :-)
(Please don't hate me)
( , Tue 16 Aug 2011, 13:51, Reply)

YouTube has a fair few terrible films on it - quake before the mighty Godmonster and beware the Killer Shrews!
If you can be arsed to sift through this sort of stuff there is the odd gem on there, though; M, Battleship Potemkin and Gulliver's Travels to name a few.
( , Tue 16 Aug 2011, 14:09, Reply)

pity he didn't live long enough to cast Edward Woodward in an Ed Wood production of Babes in the Woods - I would!
( , Tue 16 Aug 2011, 14:10, Reply)

( , Tue 16 Aug 2011, 14:23, Reply)

how much wood would edward woodward chuck if edward woodward could chuck
( , Tue 16 Aug 2011, 14:30, Reply)

Edward Woodward would chuck as much as he could chuck if Edward Woodward would chuck wood.
( , Wed 17 Aug 2011, 1:12, Reply)

The dialog is tedious, clunky and heavy, and badly spoken. The film starts to drag as there is nothing going on. They are super aliens but have only managed to create 3 zombies. Jesus this film is way worse than manos.
But technically, manos leaves plan 9 standing. Is your link the version where the sound is way way out of synch?
Woods best film is clearly Glen or Glenda, where there are moments of art-house like cinema. (the whole bit where he gets married with the devil watching and then visits god, and then the people are laughing at him and he goes into the corner surrounded and comes out as a women is fantastic and fabulous, reminiscent of Bergman even.
( , Tue 16 Aug 2011, 20:17, Reply)