Someone cloned Gmail except you're logged in as Epstein
and can see his emails.
Jmail, logged in as [email protected]
(
buffet_the_appetite_slayer ٩(●̮̃•)۶ jacked in to the ICE on, Fri 21 Nov 2025, 20:19,
Reply)
I suspect it's all largely underwhelming.
The whole Epstein thing feels like a huge amount of typical, distracting tabloid fodder.
(, Fri 21 Nov 2025, 21:53, Reply)
Quite!
- let's not look into the massive network of powerful people who are associated with the child rapist sex trafficker.
(
Invisible Wizard - 12th Level Errorer, Fri 21 Nov 2025, 22:25,
Reply)
and prolific political campaign back-scratcher
Follow the baksheesh
(
David Sylvanian, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 5:23,
Reply)
They have resisted releasing the files quite hard.
Although maintaining a 'flood the zone' (Steve Bannon) stream of information, true or false, makes it difficult to interpret what's happening.
(
FeralCatMan Unusual disease collector., Fri 21 Nov 2025, 22:27,
Reply)
I'm having trouble finding anything particularly incriminating, though.
So far it all comes across as a bit 'boys club', with the inevitable misogyny you'd expect when a group of rich, powerful, largely white men get together.
My point was, I think we know pretty much all we'll ever know about Epstein. He was a predatory nonce with a penchant for sexually exploiting young, vulnerable women. That's hardly commendable behaviour, but it's hardly surprising, either. Most heterosexual men have an inadvertent ephebophilic attraction to adolescent women, it's just that most men don't act on these attractions, either because they know it's morally wrong, or because they're worried about getting caught. Once you're in a position where you feel sufficiently insulated from any kind of legal or moral judgement for your behaviour, you're invariably going to be more likely to commit said behaviour.
There's absolutely no doubt in my mind that Epstein was acting as a broker to pimp out some of these girls to other powerful, wealthy individuals. But there's never going to be a 'list' or 'tapes' or anything that in any way explicitly implicates these people in any kind of sexually inappropriate behaviour. All we're going to get is an association with Epstein, which basically means fuck-all.
At best, all we're getting is 'These people knew that Epstein was sexually exploiting vulnerable adolescent girls, but turned a blind eye'. Which is still relatively damning, but a little less so when you realise that most of his crimes took place when next door in Soviet Canuckistan, the age of consent was 14.
(, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 7:09, Reply)
so to summarise
*paedophilia is just misogyny
*paeodophilia isnt that bad as most adult men want to fuck children, I think it's in our nature
*I havent seen the evidence as it hasn't been made public, but I'm sure they wont find anything.
*And even if they do it won't mean anything
*Canada used to have a lower age of consent 20 years ago, and some of the child fucking took place in canada (ignoring the non-exploititive provision in the law even back then that still would have made it illegal child-fucking)
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 7:52,
Reply)
Epstein was a paedophile?
I knew he was sex-trafficking underage girls, but not literal infants. When was that?
Edit: Wait! You're being hyperbolic again, aren't you?
(, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 8:09, Reply)
people who fuck kids are paedos.
epstein both fucked kids, and groomed them for other people to fuck
the reason why fucking kids is fucking awful isnt hyperbole, it's because rather than it being some normal natural thing it fucks them up for life in a way that few other things do. Giuffre might be able to better explain to you this concept that seems to be absent in your efforts to minimise it, but despite getting several million pound hush payment from Andrew she killed herself.
Still, you're welcome to follow your natural urges and fuck a 12 year old, and then protest to the inmates in the Scrubs your nuanced categorisation system of kiddy fiddling that means you don't think you're a paedo
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 9:15,
Reply)
People erroneously label Epstein a paedophile because it's more sensational than 'sex trafficker of vulnerable young women'.
(, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 9:22, Reply)
they weren't women, they were legally children
(
Invisible Wizard - 12th Level Errorer, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 9:23,
Reply)
maybe, and I'm just going to throw this out there,
rather than being motivated by sensationalism, there's actually a real, deep and widespread cultural aversion to kiddy fucking that for reasons we can only speculate you don't seem to share.
That is, people think it's one of the worst things you can do, for good reason
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 10:06,
Reply)
Interesting you should mention that
You know that the term paedophilia is commonly used to refer to all criminally underage sex?
Yes, there's a clinical distinction between paedophilia and hebophillia and ephebophillia - but not a big legal one. Sentencing guidelines taking into account moral outrage, that sort of thing.
It's not a good look to make these distinctions, except maybe when you're the judge passing sentence.
(
Invisible Wizard - 12th Level Errorer, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 9:23,
Reply)
I couldn't give a fuck how it looks.
What I give a fuck about is people watering down the concept of paedophilia to include victims that aren't anywhere near to meeting the clinical or pathological definition just so that they can falsely augment the severity of an offender's offending in return for more clicks/outrage.
Epstein was a nonce. He's done enough horrible, nasty shit as it is. We don't need to manufacture more horrible nasty shit. Doing so suggests that the *actual* horrible nasty shit he was doing wasn't sufficiently horrible/nasty enough.
Epstein was a bad man, but let's not act like he was Ian Watkins raping literal babies and toddlers bad. That does a massive fucking disservice to those victims.
(, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 9:33, Reply)
This is the only near sensible thing you've posted today
I agree, there's a difference - but all your prior posts make it look like you think that sex trafficking underage teen girls for rape *wasn't very bad*.
(
Invisible Wizard - 12th Level Errorer, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 9:40,
Reply)
Of course it's bad.
But calling him a paedophile almost serves to obfuscate the crimes that he was *actually* guilty of, which does nobody any favours. Particularly his actual victims.
Anyway, back to my original point. None of these 'files' or 'lists' we're going to get access to is going to make us any of the wiser. It's all just salacious misdirection to keep the tabloid readers distracted.
(, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 9:47, Reply)
Advice, if you want to recover from this episode of seeming nonce apologism
- stop calling the victims underage young *women*
They were legally children. Some as young as 14.
(
Invisible Wizard - 12th Level Errorer, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 9:52,
Reply)
the lawsuit against his virgin island place has some as young as 11
dozens of young girls were held captive and raped by the men Epstein flew in. one who lodged her story tried to escape by swimming the open sea from little st james. Epsten organised a search party to recapture her and confiscate her passport.
but hey, didnt that fox news megyn kelly say it wasn't a big deal and they all looked old, that's the sentiment tony will get behind
(
cumquat may will not be commenting further on the allegations, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 10:19,
Reply)
Yeah but he wasn't convicted of those so I was assuming they don't count
I gives me a headache just trying to think down to that level
(
Invisible Wizard - 12th Level Errorer, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 12:14,
Reply)
I'm starting to get SockCooker vibes.
(
FeralCatMan Unusual disease collector., Sat 22 Nov 2025, 16:19,
Reply)
So why are you repeatedly posting in a way that make it look like you want to water down what he actually did do??
"That does a massive fucking disservice to those victims."
(
My Name was saying these words inside your head on, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 10:32,
Reply)
Why are you such a fingers-in-ears right-wing cunt?
Genuine question
(, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 9:31, Reply)
Why are you such a liberal, reactionary cry-baby?
Genuine question.
(, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 9:34, Reply)
Still, he came up with the theory of relativity, so not all bad eh?
(, Sat 22 Nov 2025, 19:00, Reply)
