![This is a question](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Willenium tugs our sleeve and says: Tell us why the past was a bit shit. You may wish to use witty anecdotes reflecting your own personal experience.
( , Thu 29 Aug 2013, 13:06)
« Go Back
![This is a QotW answer](/images/board_posticon.gif)
were so much better. They promised so much.
( , Wed 4 Sep 2013, 10:05, 13 replies)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Either that, or I really get off on him off of Gladiators and/or vanquished monsters.
( , Wed 4 Sep 2013, 12:10, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
![](http://home.arcor.de/cybergoth/xype/barbarian2.gif)
There was one beastie you could kill with one swipe of the sword if you timed it right, and it would fall into two bits. Maaaaaagic.
( , Wed 4 Sep 2013, 12:47, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I'm gutted that I never knew about a sequel.
( , Wed 4 Sep 2013, 12:56, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
It had you walking through a spilt-screen maze, hitting improbable creatures and trying to jump over pools of acid in a pixel-perfect fashion.
Inevitably you'd come across some monster that was nearly impossible to hit and drained your life very quickly and then you would die. Or just get stuck trying to jump over the fucking acid pools.
Barbarian 1 was much better.
EDIT: Although judging by that screenshot, the enemy in Barbarian II was Richard O'Brien, and I suppose that goes in its favour.
( , Wed 4 Sep 2013, 16:30, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
This and Shadow of the Beast.
It has fuck all to do with the actual game, mind.
( , Wed 4 Sep 2013, 12:05, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
davidguy.brinkster.net/goaste/gameart001.html
( , Wed 4 Sep 2013, 19:16, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
"It is 'The Gentlemen', guys, not 'The Sinister Homosexual' "
( , Wed 4 Sep 2013, 19:27, closed)
« Go Back