
Amorous Badger says: "I once humorously suggested that someone had been internet-stalking a Big Brother contestant. They concluded that I was threatening them. What's the oddest misunderstanding you've been involved in?"
( , Thu 12 Dec 2013, 13:48)
« Go Back

"Labour are doing a shite job of running the country. The Tories are the other big party, so they must be able to do a better job. Let's vote them in instead."
Please send your answers to Spot the Logic Competition, PO Box 142, Basingstoke.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 12:01, 34 replies)

More a logistical one.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 12:07, closed)

that a party can be elected not on the basis that it "is the best" but that it "could marginally to be argued to be the least worst in current circumstances", i.e. when public memory has faded of how epically they fucked it up last time.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 12:14, closed)

It's not the institution of democracy that I'm attacking; it's the perplexing habit some people have of voting for a party that is populated and managed by arseholes and visibly proud of the fact.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 12:39, closed)

EG the "I'm a Labour/Conservative/Liberal/MRL man, and I always have been. I'll always vote for them!"
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 12:43, closed)

Sometimes several stupidities co-exist within a single person, like the elderly US voter interviewed by the BBC in the run-up to the Presidential elections that saw Barack Obama take office: "I have been a Democratic voter all my life, but I will not vote for a negro."
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 12:48, closed)

People get all uppity.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 12:50, closed)

( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 13:10, closed)

But that's not my concern - I'm an ideas man, not a factory foreman.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 13:21, closed)

Handing control to an intellectual elite would preclude your participation.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 13:30, closed)

make it most expensive to those who can least afford it, and those who are likely to abuse it
bollocks, I didn't read the thread above so this makes no sense in context
never mind
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 21:12, closed)

One of Nevil Shute's novels - I think it was In The Wet, posited an interesting future Britain in which people have multiple votes allocated to them, up to 7, depending on...
One by default, everyone has this
One for completing a degree, a professional qualification, or being appointed an officer in the military
One for foreign travel
then some slightly more dubious ones
One for achieving a high personal income over a certain level
One for family values - raising 2 children without divorcing
then it starts getting really surreal
One for being an official of the church
One that can only be awarded by the reigning monarch, for merit
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 21:25, closed)

( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 12:38, closed)

The campaign was given little-to-no coverage where I live; the press were a lot more interested in Nigel Farage and his plane-crashing antics.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 12:46, closed)

Wouldn't want to come home in the middle of this year's Christmas Purges.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 12:14, closed)

I normally use undercooked economy Danish pork.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 12:37, closed)

They have the added benefit of lasting an entire week, for optimum cleansing.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 12:52, closed)

voted for the Lib Dems, which was essentially the same thing as voting Tory. The majority of people didn't want a Tory govt. Labour are cunts but their not fucking cunts. Sad that's my voting criteria for 2015....
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 15:50, closed)

If people don't like Labour, they vote Tory. If they don't like the Tories, they vote Labour. If these people stopped to think for a moment, they might remember a third party, whose policies are neither champagne socialist nor Orwellian, and if a sufficient number of people voted for that third party, then voting for it would no longer be the same thing as voting for [whichever of the other two parties is not currently in power]. But these people don't vote for the Lib Dems, because "they've never been in power", which is tantamount to saying they've never had an opportunity to prove they're bad, unlike the other two, who get opportunities to show how they can fuck things up on a regular basis.
I do agree with your classification, though: Labour are corrupt and incompetent but the Conservatives are actively evil.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 16:21, closed)

Nick Clegg has barely voiced an opinion.
Either way, we're fucked.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 16:34, closed)

They had a voice in Paddy Ashdown. Not had much luck in recent years finding a leader who wasn't either a lame duck or an alkie.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 16:41, closed)

Paddy was trutworthy, as was John Smith for labour. Damn your heart John!!! In affect his death allowed that slimey tory to run the labour party into the ground. People on B3ta seem to have a lot of time perhaps we should start a party??
( , Thu 19 Dec 2013, 10:18, closed)

For John Smith it was:
Pros - Trustworthy, principled
Cons - Crap heart.
For Dominique Strauss-Kahn it was:
Pros - Brilliant political and financial brain
Cons - Sex pest.
( , Thu 19 Dec 2013, 11:43, closed)

I see your point though.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 18:09, closed)

Between the outright lying, and vote yellow, get blue, I'd imagine that they'll be back in the political wilderness for some time.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 16:38, closed)

... the ruling party lose it.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 17:39, closed)

You're clearly not thick enough.
( , Wed 18 Dec 2013, 23:24, closed)

Then they might end up getting the balance of power in the senate and then hold the balance of power.
At least then when people whinge about the govt. you can say you didn't vote for Labour/Tory/LNP/Labor/Democrat/Republican.
*Actual vote wastage may vary.*
( , Thu 19 Dec 2013, 7:16, closed)
« Go Back