No, it isn't.
Or are you suggesting that an omnipotent being would be incapable of granting free will to his/her/its creations?
( monster munch person, man, woman... camera... TV?, Tue 17 Jul 2012, 23:42, 2 replies)

Why are you arguing about free will
if God has erectile dysfunction.
(the other guy not the one that gave you coochie warts, Wed 18 Jul 2012, 1:13, closed)

As an all powerful being,
I'd imagine that god both does and does not have trouble getting it up, as the mood takes him.
( monster munch person, man, woman... camera... TV?, Wed 18 Jul 2012, 9:34, closed)

he's got the ultimate get out card there, I suspect.

( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Wed 18 Jul 2012, 17:15, closed)

Immovable object, meet irresistible force
Enough free will do do something that an omnipotent God can't prevent and an omniscient God can't foresee?
(ubergeekian, Wed 18 Jul 2012, 9:45, closed)

Being omniscient and omnipotent
would neither oblige nor compel any sort of supreme being to intervene to prevent "bad stuff" from happening.
This is fairly elementary theology, and not something that has passed the world's religions by. Talking in logical fallacies isn't going to progress the debate any.
( monster munch person, man, woman... camera... TV?, Wed 18 Jul 2012, 12:22, closed)