Annoying words and phrases
Marketing bollocks, buzzword bingo, or your mum saying "fudge" when she really wants to swear like a trooper. Let's ride the hockey stick curve of this top hat product, solutioneers.
Thanks to simbosan for the idea
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:13)
Marketing bollocks, buzzword bingo, or your mum saying "fudge" when she really wants to swear like a trooper. Let's ride the hockey stick curve of this top hat product, solutioneers.
Thanks to simbosan for the idea
( , Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:13)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
send the keeper the wrong way
you look one way or "shape to shoot one way" and shoot the other way, so you send the kepper the other way with your body language or your eyes.
The keeper guesses the right way, the keeper guesses that you are going to shoot in a certain way and gets a save in.
Seems ok to me
( , Mon 12 Apr 2010, 12:05, 1 reply)
you look one way or "shape to shoot one way" and shoot the other way, so you send the kepper the other way with your body language or your eyes.
The keeper guesses the right way, the keeper guesses that you are going to shoot in a certain way and gets a save in.
Seems ok to me
( , Mon 12 Apr 2010, 12:05, 1 reply)
I'm not suggesting that it isn't possible
for the striker to send the keeper the wrong way. What I'm saying is that the commentator doesn't know whether this happened or not. It could equally be that the keeper has a set pattern. It's the assumption that it must be because of the taker's action that the keeper dives the wrong way that is incorrect. If the keeper's actions were wholly dictated by taker then the commentators should also say, (when the keeper goes the right way) that the taker sent the keeper the right way.
( , Thu 15 Apr 2010, 0:16, closed)
for the striker to send the keeper the wrong way. What I'm saying is that the commentator doesn't know whether this happened or not. It could equally be that the keeper has a set pattern. It's the assumption that it must be because of the taker's action that the keeper dives the wrong way that is incorrect. If the keeper's actions were wholly dictated by taker then the commentators should also say, (when the keeper goes the right way) that the taker sent the keeper the right way.
( , Thu 15 Apr 2010, 0:16, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread