![This is a question](/images/board_posticon.gif)
What's your favourite one that you almost believe? And why? We're popping on our tinfoil hats and very much looking forward to your answers. (Thanks to Shezam for this suggestion.)
( , Thu 1 Dec 2011, 13:47)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
was funded by a shooter's group - who obviously would have had a bit of an agenda ie prove that gun ownership wasn't the problem.
( , Sat 3 Dec 2011, 16:07, 1 reply)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
The problem was that a nutjob killed a load of kids. You can do that with or without a legally-registered firearm, and let's be honest, anyone who's not deterred by the prospect of umpteen child murder convictions is hardly going to be put off by any firearms legislation you could possibly propose.
( , Sat 3 Dec 2011, 16:15, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
somebody who is not deterred by the idea of murdering children is unlikely to be deterred by any legislation at all.
( , Sat 3 Dec 2011, 16:58, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
if it were legal, I'd be tempted to take it up as a sport.
( , Sat 3 Dec 2011, 17:06, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( , Sat 3 Dec 2011, 17:28, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
don't be silly, they'd be far to floppy and slippery to get a decent grouping.
( , Mon 5 Dec 2011, 11:30, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
what would have happened if Hamilton had gone in with a golf club (could easily kill a kid with a whack to the head)? Would Golf have been banned?
( , Sat 3 Dec 2011, 18:40, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( , Sat 3 Dec 2011, 19:13, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I wondered what they would ban if I managed to kill several people with a pointy spoon handle. I'm quite sure that I could get at least half a dozen in fairly rapid succession, and the headlines would have to be hysterical.
( , Sat 3 Dec 2011, 22:21, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Sort of makes sense to me to make it a bit harder if we can.
Although frankly toddlers are asking for it, with their furtive weeing and provocative 'we are the future' stance.
( , Sun 4 Dec 2011, 17:18, closed)
![This is a QotW comment](/images/board_posticon.gif)
because there will always be a means. Where there's a will, there's a way, so the saying goes.
The ultimate logical conclusion is to have everyone chained to their beds and fed through tubes by machines...
( , Sun 4 Dec 2011, 17:24, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread