B3TA fixes the world
Moon Monkey says: Turn into Jeremy Clarkson for a moment, and tell us about the things that are so obviously wrong with the world, and how they should be fixed. Extra points for ludicrous over-simplification, blatant mis-representation, and humourous knob-gags.
( , Thu 22 Sep 2011, 12:53)
Moon Monkey says: Turn into Jeremy Clarkson for a moment, and tell us about the things that are so obviously wrong with the world, and how they should be fixed. Extra points for ludicrous over-simplification, blatant mis-representation, and humourous knob-gags.
( , Thu 22 Sep 2011, 12:53)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I did a Computer and Electronics degree.
Was a brilliant course, but for some strange reason you didn't have to have any qualifications in electronics or computing to get on.
This was raised in a meeting at one point and apparently having a maths qualification was close enough. Fair enough, maths is important for computing and electronics, but surely the point of FURTHER education is that you at least have some knowledge of the basics of your chosen field?
That's probably why there were only about 10 of us left in the final year out of about 100 at the start.
( , Fri 23 Sep 2011, 14:26, 1 reply)
Was a brilliant course, but for some strange reason you didn't have to have any qualifications in electronics or computing to get on.
This was raised in a meeting at one point and apparently having a maths qualification was close enough. Fair enough, maths is important for computing and electronics, but surely the point of FURTHER education is that you at least have some knowledge of the basics of your chosen field?
That's probably why there were only about 10 of us left in the final year out of about 100 at the start.
( , Fri 23 Sep 2011, 14:26, 1 reply)
Well
I have a degree in computing - only, back then, it was called Data Processing. I had to program in COBOL.
Since then, I've spent most of my working life in IT and, I can categorically state, that maths,beyond addy up and takky away, are not needed.
A grasp of boolean logic is a must, but maths? - nah...
Cheers
( , Fri 23 Sep 2011, 14:34, closed)
I have a degree in computing - only, back then, it was called Data Processing. I had to program in COBOL.
Since then, I've spent most of my working life in IT and, I can categorically state, that maths,beyond addy up and takky away, are not needed.
A grasp of boolean logic is a must, but maths? - nah...
Cheers
( , Fri 23 Sep 2011, 14:34, closed)
Ok, maybe not all
( , Fri 23 Sep 2011, 14:38, closed)
I concur - I failed all the maths modules in my Engineering + Computer Science degree
...but got a 2:1 and am still working as a Hairy Programmer.
Oh, you do need to be able to grasp number bases, of course. But I can't say I've needed any Laplace transforms, Nyquist stability plots or partial differential equations recently*
* except when in bed with a laydee, obviously**
** they love it when you talk nerdy
( , Fri 23 Sep 2011, 14:39, closed)
...but got a 2:1 and am still working as a Hairy Programmer.
Oh, you do need to be able to grasp number bases, of course. But I can't say I've needed any Laplace transforms, Nyquist stability plots or partial differential equations recently*
* except when in bed with a laydee, obviously**
** they love it when you talk nerdy
( , Fri 23 Sep 2011, 14:39, closed)
They love a bit of binomial expansion, too
(so I've heard, anyway)
( , Fri 23 Sep 2011, 14:50, closed)
(so I've heard, anyway)
( , Fri 23 Sep 2011, 14:50, closed)
Maths leading on to programming
is more a state of mind than a requirement. The sort of mind that can derive differentiation from first principals, or even just work easily in algebra, is probably also the kind of mind that finds it easy to break a problem in to small enough pieces to teach a computer to play three blind mice.
( , Fri 23 Sep 2011, 14:49, closed)
is more a state of mind than a requirement. The sort of mind that can derive differentiation from first principals, or even just work easily in algebra, is probably also the kind of mind that finds it easy to break a problem in to small enough pieces to teach a computer to play three blind mice.
( , Fri 23 Sep 2011, 14:49, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread