rachelswipe: Proven more stalkery than me.

(PsychoChomp, Mon 7 Feb 2011, 14:09, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

i'm not a judge
but i'm the closest thing to one on here, and i say that the evidence against this statement is overwhelming
( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 7 Feb 2011, 14:12, Reply)

The equivilent would be me looking through someones medical records to find their address.
Which is deeply creepy and highly illegal.
(PsychoChomp, Mon 7 Feb 2011, 14:13, Reply)

nooooo it wasn't like that
i was the office work experience gimp, i didn't have access to any records! i was just asked to stuff envelopes with flyers for customers, i knew which part of stockport he lived in because he had told us, he had an unusual surname, and when i saw that he was on the list, i just memorised it.

that is NOT the same as going onto the computer with the deliberate intention of looking up someone's medical and address history, you remain substantially creepier than i am.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 7 Feb 2011, 14:16, Reply)

The fact that you have said teacher's facebook page open in another tab at this very moment
gives the lie to that statement.
(wellgroomedwookiee is a filthy-minded hobgoblin, Mon 7 Feb 2011, 14:12, Reply)

nah
now i know he likes teh cock i have finally gotten over him.

15 years later.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 7 Feb 2011, 14:17, Reply)

Does this explain the shitty-twat comment from earlier?

( JeffTheDogFucker Can you dig it?, Mon 7 Feb 2011, 14:18, Reply)

That was a reply to Chompy, you oaf.
You have RUINED my point with your up-to-date knowledge of his sexual proclivities.
(wellgroomedwookiee is a filthy-minded hobgoblin, Mon 7 Feb 2011, 14:21, Reply)

in my defence nobody ever replies to psychochomp, therefore i was not expecting it
and secondly, like the proclivities would stop the stalking.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 7 Feb 2011, 14:23, Reply)