b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1073304 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I'd be suprised if there isn't a link between childhood nutrition and intelligence.
Because childhood nutrition affects nearly everything, and intelligence is effected by nearly everything.
(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:16, 3 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
affected
you didn't eat enough fish Chompy
(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:19, Reply)
meh I got it right at first.

(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:20, Reply)
Pfft! what do you know.

(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:19, Reply)
Lots, I've read about it in books.

(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:22, Reply)
Oh! ok then.

(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:31, Reply)
Some of them had pictures

(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:33, Reply)
The rest had pop-up parts!

(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:33, Reply)
Giving up so easily?
Really, I can't wait to hear what you "reckon". Knowledge based on personal experience is always so useful and unbiased.
(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:34, Reply)
Whereas regurgitating an opinion formed by someone else
in a book or an article which of course has not conceivably got a an agenda behind it, is absolutely the right way about it.

I think we should all just admit that unless we're experts in a particular field, then all our opinions are pretty shit
(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:36, Reply)
My original post is basically saying that,
but I'm not allowed to comment on anything to do with children bgb says so.
(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:38, Reply)
I was starting a joke thread considering our past spats but then gave up due to lack of energy.

(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:41, Reply)
Chompy used to wear spats?
I like him now.
(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:42, Reply)
You should eat better.

(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:44, Reply)
I eat very well.

(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:50, Reply)
I'm glad you agree but I'm too tired to debate further.

(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:36, Reply)
that's probably due to poor nutrition

(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:43, Reply)
Haha!

(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:43, Reply)
If that is so to such a large extent
then surely the majority of urban dwellers born during and immediately after WWII woudl be thick, which is demonstrably not the case.

My mother (first at university and one of the most well-read and intelligent people I've ever met) was brought up on powdered eggs etc.
(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:42, Reply)
There are always exceptions to every rule.
Just think what she could have achieved had she been fed properly.
(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:43, Reply)
Not produced a feckless layabout son?

(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:46, Reply)
She's a lesbo though,
obviously brain wrong.
(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:44, Reply)
She's making up for the years
when due to post-war austerity measures she wasn't able to eat rugs, clearly.
(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:47, Reply)
I read somewhere
that in fact general standards of nutrition improved during and after the war.
(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:44, Reply)
If you heard what my (slightly mental) grandmother fed my father
you would be surprised to discover he was not a gibbering simpleton.
(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:46, Reply)
Large scale allotments
and a varied diet out of necessary.
(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:46, Reply)
This is why I specified 'urban' people.

(, Wed 9 Feb 2011, 9:49, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1