Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
The laydeez dresses on Strictly can be good
(, Tue 10 May 2011, 15:16, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
Possibly I've been part of the Ballroom world too long and am searching for diamonds in the shite though.
Sadly most female Ballroom dancers are fuck-ugly for some reason, but the occasional looker with decent taste in dresses can look fucking amazing.
(, Tue 10 May 2011, 15:19, Reply)
Fucking Oompa-loompa slags.
(, Tue 10 May 2011, 15:24, Reply)
One of my biggest gripes as regards Ballroom is how much appearance counts for and how being orange seems to have retained importance as a convention. There's something very sobering about using a bathroom mirror to do your tie up and having to share it with a man who's painting his face orange using ridiculously heavy foundation.
(, Tue 10 May 2011, 15:29, Reply)
when having a cut-throat razor up the sleeve can really pay dividends.
(, Tue 10 May 2011, 15:31, Reply)
for two reasons. One, for resisting the open goal. And two, it's been ages since I've seen a decent use of "pay dividends".
(, Tue 10 May 2011, 15:37, Reply)
(, Tue 10 May 2011, 15:33, Reply)
You know, like bumming them or something?
(, Tue 10 May 2011, 15:34, Reply)
But I do love your brazen disregard for subtlety. Have a click, both of you
(, Tue 10 May 2011, 15:36, Reply)
but I think you may be right, as I just lolled at Sportscow's version.
(, Tue 10 May 2011, 15:39, Reply)
but to be fair, they're designed to be eye catching. and for some reason, to be as revealing as possible.
(, Tue 10 May 2011, 15:21, Reply)
It's when you see the dresses in long shot and it looks completely backless and half frontless, then you see it close up and it's all body-stocking and gaffer tape. What's the point of that?
(, Tue 10 May 2011, 15:25, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread