Off TopicAre you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(
rob, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
*makes notes furiously*Thank you very much, appreciate you taking the time. I especially like the subtly interwoven insults. I must defend my taste if not my sexuality; I would never go and see Priscilla, because the film was fucking shit.
EDIT: In reference to the possibility of a mini-bash, I had considered suggesting it but am not sure how many of you are on the List Of B3tans I'd Trust Enough To Introduce The Missus To. It is a conspicuously short list, with about 6 or 7 names. Who lives in London apart from yourself and Monty?
(, Fri 29 Jul 2011, 9:16, 1 reply, 15 years ago)
I must take issue with thisI know, better than most I think, what constitutes fabulous.
(, Fri 29 Jul 2011, 9:19, Reply)
I'm the biggest fag hag in the universe.I think I have some say in the matter also.
(
girlinthehole, Fri 29 Jul 2011, 9:21,
Reply)
Not any moreJust because a film is camp as tits does not make it good
(, Fri 29 Jul 2011, 9:24, Reply)
It's nothing to do with the camp.It's the fucking acting credentials.
Guy Pierce
Terence Stamp
Hugo Weaving
(
girlinthehole, Fri 29 Jul 2011, 9:28,
Reply)
No, YOU go weaving(
The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Fri 29 Jul 2011, 9:31,
Reply)
Great cast, no questionYou know what else has great actors in it? Heaven's Gate.
(, Fri 29 Jul 2011, 9:33, Reply)
The story line is good as is the cinematography.You're off your head lad.
(
girlinthehole, Fri 29 Jul 2011, 9:35,
Reply)
The storyline is daft at best and nonsensical at worstAnd unlike various other Hugo Weaving films which suffer from the same affliction, it doesn't have massive explosions to distract from its flaws
(, Fri 29 Jul 2011, 9:37, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread