b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1359000 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

It's not that unbelievable is it.
I mean, the fact that it actually happened makes it quite easy for me to believe it.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 9:38, 2 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
is that the best you can manage this morning?
basic facetiousness
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 9:39, Reply)
Could I do an impression of Nick Clegg instead, and answer every question in a rhetorical manner?
Yes.

Would this make me a face punch worthy twat like him?

Yes.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 9:40, Reply)
Been on radio 4 this morning?
I thought justin gave him a bit of a hard time
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 9:42, Reply)
I thought Justin gave him a jusifiably hard time
I normally dislike Justin, but he was spot on the money whey he pointed out that we are not the same as Greece or Italy, and what annoyed me is that he didn't pull him up on continually confusing "debt" and "deficit" as if they were one and the same.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 9:44, Reply)
he annoyed me by continuingly asking why things were not happening more quickly with reagrd to 'bankers bonuses'
when the point nick made about leaglly binding contracts really answered it, full stop.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 9:45, Reply)
Yeah, fair point.
Still, it was better than the pathetic attempt to interview him made by Bill Turnbull on BBC breakfast.

That said, did you by any chance hear PM yesterday when they had Richard Dawkins and some secondary school "science" teacher talking about intelligent design.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 9:47, Reply)
Bill is a light weight
No i didn't hear Richard Dawkins, not sure I can stomach himm in the morning, no matter how uch I agree with his 'beliefs'
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 9:50, Reply)
He was remarkably restrained
especially when the "science" teacher started questioning the legitimacy of radioactive dating techniques.
(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 9:52, Reply)
gosh, you seem to have misunderstood. i think he means "how it could have happened" is the unbelievable part

(, Tue 20 Sep 2011, 9:39, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1