I am unconvinced.
it seems that, at best it could show with 100% accuracy what you were seeing. This could be achieved with a video camera pointing the way you are looking, no? or am I missing something, seems like a nice trick, might lead to something interesting, maybe one day, but for now a fun novelty, or am I missing something, might be better with a more detailed description of the process.
( CQ Knows the truth, all of it., Sat 24 Sep 2011, 22:20, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

...or record your dreams
just like in that red dwarf episode...don't worry Monty's not around to judge you for admitting you remember it
( Citizen Cavy Admires your passion for conformity, Sat 24 Sep 2011, 22:25, Reply)

Only the visual component of my dreams
and only assuming that that component is processed by my visual cortex in the same way as things I see. It's a stretch.
( CQ Knows the truth, all of it., Sat 24 Sep 2011, 22:40, Reply)

just because you are ashamed of your dreams...

( Citizen Cavy Admires your passion for conformity, Sat 24 Sep 2011, 22:49, Reply)

Not especially.
but the last one I remember would have been very dull just based on the visuals.
( CQ Knows the truth, all of it., Sat 24 Sep 2011, 22:51, Reply)

oh...boring
i hope your milky drink is nicer than my not so milky drink the other day
( Citizen Cavy Admires your passion for conformity, Sat 24 Sep 2011, 22:53, Reply)

The computer is attempting to predict what it should be seeing against a bank of video images

( WormuIus, Sun 25 Sep 2011, 10:25, Reply)

so at this point it's just
best guessing from options? So we're a way off it actually recognising actual, original images, then?
( Citizen Cavy Admires your passion for conformity, Sun 25 Sep 2011, 10:33, Reply)

exactly

( WormuIus, Sun 25 Sep 2011, 11:28, Reply)