b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1374429 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Oh, those old DGsomethingsomethings, yeah I know those.

(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 10:31, 2 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
They're both 10/100 so you won't notice any increased cable speeds
and that's machine to machine routing inside your LAN. The only thing that'll affect internet speed is your cable connection into your house.

It's wireless N, which I imagine the old one isn't, but again, you'll only notice a difference from machine to machine. Your internet will be slower than wireless G.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 10:36, Reply)
Why will the internet be slower on wireless n?
And, and, and, ADSL 2?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 10:38, Reply)
Wireless G is slower than wireless N
I just meant that your internet connection is probably going to be slower than them both.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 10:40, Reply)
ADSL2+ is just a fancy way of saying they're doubling your bandwidth, basically.
You don't need anything special to use it on your end.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 10:43, Reply)
Really?
So my IT support guy is lying when he says we need to upgrade our office router to one that's ADSL 2+?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 10:46, Reply)
I don't know about lying.
He probably means that the router can't handle the bandwidth that ADSL2+ is capable of delivering.

Companies typically have much larger connections than home users.

Edit: it really depends on how old your work router is and whether it can have its firmware updated if it is old.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 10:48, Reply)
Can you explain bandwidth to me using an anaolgy that is probably innacurate?

(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 10:49, Reply)
It's a relatively simple concept but comes with a fuckton of variables that complicate matters.
If you've got a 1mbps connection and you're sending a 1mb email, it shoudl take 1 second to send. If you're sending a 2mb email over a 1mb connection, it'll take two seconds. If you're sending 0.5mb, it'll take half a second.

If you've got two people sending 1mb emails over a 1mbps connection, it'll take 2 seconds because the bandwidth gets split between the two things.

The old electrical analogy of a garden hosepipe could still be used, only the more water you put into it does not come with a subsequent increase in pressure, it just takes longer.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 10:58, Reply)
Now can you explain to me where babies come from?

(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 11:01, Reply)
Oh it's ok, I think Himjim has done that below

(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 11:02, Reply)
imagine fibre optic broadband is as wide as TGB vagina
dial up is as tight and The Luggage's, I hope this helps
(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 10:59, Reply)
Imagine a hosepipe that runs through a pump (the router)
The pump can only go at a certain speed. If someone increases the pressure of the water in the hosepipe, the rate of flow coming out of the pump will be the same because it can only go at a certain speed.

Getting a bigger pump is the only way to deal with the increased pressure.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 11:01, Reply)
Okay, I think I sort of understand.

(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 11:06, Reply)
The other thing worth explaining is that the hosepipe itself is owned by Thames Water
and so it fucking leaks. That's why they tell you you won't get that maximum bandwidth if you're any distance from the nearest exchange.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 11:11, Reply)
I think it might be this one:
www.google.co.uk/products/catalog?hl=en&cp=10&gs_id=12&xhr=t&q=netgear+dg834g&gs_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&biw=1440&bih=710&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=shop&cid=5113624221522242262&sa=X&ei=vo2FTtzYOKPS4QT37NGeDw&sqi=2&ved=0CHkQ8wIwAQ
(, Fri 30 Sep 2011, 10:37, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1