Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
It's another check and balance, increasing the stability of a large organisation which is good in the long run.
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:07, Reply)
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:11, Reply)
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:12, Reply)
Or getting them in with immigration officials striking.
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:13, Reply)
Every person has the right to withdraw their labour.
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:14, Reply)
if you want to get paid more, stop being useless and get promoted, move to the private sector etc
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:15, Reply)
and he may have written a book, but he was talking about the "unsung heroes" in afganistan, the mechanic who works 12 hours shifts in 50 degree heat, and said "then you hear about students and civil servants on strike and you think, they've not got is so bad, they should get on with their jobs".
I thought he was a stupid cunt.
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:17, Reply)
You're not a slave to the employer, you're legally exchanging your labour for money within a set guideline.
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:18, Reply)
either you accept that union leaders are required so that unions can actually exist, even if they occasionally inconvenience you when supporting their members interests, or you don't think unions are a good idea and therefore striking is just someone not turning up for work, which should be a sackable offence.
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:15, Reply)
There are certain union leaders, such as Bob Crow and Dave Prentis, who fuck me off.
They are more interested in politics than helping union members (yes I know that government policy directly impacts the rights of union members and the leaders role includes an element of political influence), see Prentis during the labour leadership election as an example.
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:20, Reply)
or when the government is trying to change the law to deprive their members of their rights, and they do a good job since their members are doing alright because of them.
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:22, Reply)
and "another flimsy reason to hold various parts of the country to ransom"
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:25, Reply)
and "what the actual reason for any given dispute is".
Since the papers never actually give the full facts you cannot possibly make that statement.
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:28, Reply)
in a lot of cases, oh yes I can.
not all, I accept, but enough for me to be comfortable in RMT cuntishness.
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:44, Reply)
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:53, Reply)
timed just around oh let's see now...the start of the fucking summer holidays. Cunts.
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:28, Reply)
initially quite a few of them had sympathy with the tube drivers. but the RMT has called strikes too many times. people now look at their salaries, holidays, job security, and think, hmmmmm what the fuck are they whining about.
when if they had kept it for the really big issues, they'd still have more public support.
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:29, Reply)
they are there to represent their members, and they do it well.
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:32, Reply)
who are there to serve the public, whatever else you want to say.
london depends on the transport network, for people's jobs, social lives, tourism... all of which pump money into the economy.
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:48, Reply)
(, Wed 26 Oct 2011, 16:17, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread