You told me you weren't fat.
Also, this is your second incidence of not reading properly today 'Swipo - the question clearly stated that b3ta could be taken as read.
( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Mon 7 Nov 2011, 15:52, 1 reply, 14 years ago)

i don't think i've ever said that
however, it is true that if i lost 137 stone, i would be in many many many negatives of pounds.

ssssh. lawyers never read anything!
( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 7 Nov 2011, 15:53, Reply)

Except their pay cheques.

( CQ Knows the truth, all of it., Mon 7 Nov 2011, 15:54, Reply)

haha yeah right
the haemorrhaging of tax and NI would make me weep.

they are all in my drawer, still sealed!
( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 7 Nov 2011, 15:55, Reply)

Tsk.
So rich you don't even count your money.... *shakes head*
( CQ Knows the truth, all of it., Mon 7 Nov 2011, 16:00, Reply)

i can't count

( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 7 Nov 2011, 16:24, Reply)

I didn't for one moment think that you were currently 144 stone
I can spot an exaggeration when I see one.
If I could be bothered to use the search I could provide you with evidence of your claims, but I am too busy procrastinating.

I bet you read the amount on the cheque to cross reference with your invoice.
( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Mon 7 Nov 2011, 15:57, Reply)

some bits of me are skinny
the boobs are many tonnes of fat. stupid things.

no, my accounts department does that.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 7 Nov 2011, 15:58, Reply)

out of context click

(Quintno EXPERIMENT RUINED CANCELLED, LEFT 4EVER, Mon 7 Nov 2011, 16:04, Reply)

You little cock.
*fails, once again to keep a straight face*
( CQ Knows the truth, all of it., Mon 7 Nov 2011, 16:19, Reply)