 Off Topic
 Off TopicAre you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
 
	 Raise the Tax threshold to 20k a year and raise the 50% threshold to 200k, suggest a 0.5% annual tax on all total personal wealth valued at over 1 million and maybe combine or abolish other taxes too, but increase the rates of them.
Alt- Boris is a genuinely intelligent man, I would not mind seeing him as PM.
As to who else would make a great comedy PM, I give a typical reply.
Have a guess as to who it would be.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 15:42, 4 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
 It's more about maturity and intellectual ability rather than age.
	It's more about maturity and intellectual ability rather than age.I expect you will still be a fuckwit when you've retired.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 15:46, Reply)
 If you are measuring Intellectual ability by Academic performance, I am perfectly competent.
	If you are measuring Intellectual ability by Academic performance, I am perfectly competent.Also, I'm not childish, I am able to respect other peoples opinions and the usual stuff.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 15:47, Reply)
 I'm packing some GCSE's too freefair, they bare rinse shit out bruv
	I'm packing some GCSE's too freefair, they bare rinse shit out bruv(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 15:50, Reply)
 I don't think anyone in Britain today
	I don't think anyone in Britain todaymeasures intellectual ability by academic performance - the top universities certainly don't and neither do I as an employer.
Soz.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 15:52, Reply)
 so the average wage of £18,000pa and the majority of people under it wouldn't pay tax?
	so the average wage of £18,000pa and the majority of people under it wouldn't pay tax?clever that, can't see us going bankrupt like greece there
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 15:52, Reply)
 We'd raise the rest through cracking down on corporate evasion and through the wealth tax.
	We'd raise the rest through cracking down on corporate evasion and through the wealth tax.Also, the resultant across the board tax cut would potentially produce more revenue, like it did when the bottom rate went from 40 to 20p in the 80's.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 15:54, Reply)
 Make companies pay every penny they owe, hire more tax inspectors, simplify the tax code.
	Make companies pay every penny they owe, hire more tax inspectors, simplify the tax code.The way other nations do it.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:02, Reply)
 Sounds like hot air
	Sounds like hot airBritain has a relatively efficient tax administration system largely free of the widespread corruption as demonstrated by a number of countries within the EU, let alone the rest of the world
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:06, Reply)
 I'm using many of the Anti-Cuts protesters arguments here but using them to say reduce tax
	I'm using many of the Anti-Cuts protesters arguments here but using them to say reduce taxrather than "Maintain/Raise public spending".
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:08, Reply)
 How do you propose to measure everyone's 'wealth'?
	How do you propose to measure everyone's 'wealth'?Maybe everyone in the country can fill in a form every year.
And then HMRC could recruit 10s of 1000s of staff to process them all.
Oh wait a minute, this isn't really simplifying things, is it?
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:03, Reply)
 So therefore you can't raise the funds to remove half the country from taxation.
	So therefore you can't raise the funds to remove half the country from taxation.jelly.b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post1510405
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:05, Reply)
 Raise other taxes then.
	Raise other taxes then.Maybe put a 60% tax on all income above 250k a year or thereabouts.
It would be the same as Denmark then.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:07, Reply)
 You're just guessing with numbers here
	You're just guessing with numbers hereTaxing a relatively small number of people earning over £250K at 60% will not make up for removing millions of people from taxation altogether.
Plus of course people on £250K p.a. probably already employ accountants to help to minimise their exposure in the first place.
Your numbers, such as they are, don't add up.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:13, Reply)
 They wouldn't would they.
	They wouldn't would they.It is only something that took 15 seconds to think up.
I didn't expect a full cost analysis.
If it really could increase the defecit I'd not do it.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:14, Reply)
 £1m pounds isn't very much, particularly if you live in the South East
	£1m pounds isn't very much, particularly if you live in the South East(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:01, Reply)
 I haven't decided on the specific numbers but the principle remains true.
	I haven't decided on the specific numbers but the principle remains true.(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:02, Reply)
 Fair enough.
	Fair enough.I thought I recognised the unflappable confidence in nonsense of an adolescent.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:46, Reply)
 I've always said that they should open up school facilities to the public after school hours.
	I've always said that they should open up school facilities to the public after school hours.Like a collage that has evening classes. And people can give lessons on whatever they want on the basis that they give XX% of the class to the school and the people taking these lessons pay for anything they use and leave the room ready to use in the morning.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:43, Reply)
 So anyone can start a class, even people who aren't educated.
	So anyone can start a class, even people who aren't educated.For example, if I wanted to give lessons on website development, I could do so. The whole thing would be volentier based, I can charge or not, up to me.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:44, Reply)
 Phone your local schools and ask them.
	Phone your local schools and ask them.You appear to have had a good idea that's been common practice since before you were born.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:45, Reply)
 yeah, but what's to stop someone who knows fuck all about something
	yeah, but what's to stop someone who knows fuck all about somethinggiving lessons and just taking your money and teaching you rubbish?
Gillian McKeith teaching nutritional biology for example.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:46, Reply)
 That's the beauty of a free market.
	That's the beauty of a free market.Charlatans teaching charlatans. A pyramid scheme of poo-obsessed new-age fruitloops.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 16:48, Reply)
 That's one of the [what I thought was] revolutionary ideas behind it...
	That's one of the [what I thought was] revolutionary ideas behind it...... it's not there to get a qualification on the wall, but to share knowledge between one person and a group. It can be things like a cleaner teaching people how to clean a house/do the washing/general 'life skills', what product to use with what, that sort of thing.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 17:15, Reply)
 I refer to my earlier point
	I refer to my earlier pointwhat if the person concerned is a really shit cleaner?
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 17:26, Reply)
 Then I reckon they'd get found out pretty quick and nobody would turn up to their lessons.
	Then I reckon they'd get found out pretty quick and nobody would turn up to their lessons.(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 17:28, Reply)
 I refer you to my earlier point
	I refer you to my earlier pointGillian McKeith. I've not noticed her short of a see-through pot to shit in and then look at recently.
The problem is that people are retarded, therefore there needs to be some control over who is allowed to teach them. Ideally, people who aren't retarded.
(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 17:33, Reply)
 Oh, I know church halls do, and sometimes colalges do, but I didn't realise schools do.
	Oh, I know church halls do, and sometimes colalges do, but I didn't realise schools do.(, Tue 24 Jan 2012, 17:20, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

