b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1599423 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

THATS THE JOKE

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:07, 1 reply, 12 years ago)
Nice to see you have finally adopted this's spelling.

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:14, Reply)
urrrrgh
people who don't get apostrophes really annoy me. it's soooooo simple.

abbreviation or possessive? it gets an apostrophe. plural? it doesn't. the only two exceptions you need in every day life are "its" and "it's" and "who's" and "whose". THAT'S IT! THAT REALLY IS IT! THAT'S THE GOLDEN RULE YOU MORON.

when i am queen, i will burn every shop selling "fish and chip's".
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:22, Reply)
Chip's what?

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:24, Reply)
Can you also destroy all people who mix up "was" and "were" in speech?

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:25, Reply)
First up against the wall
"were not were"
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:26, Reply)
don't "shake your head" at that

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:32, Reply)
As well as "have" and "of".

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:28, Reply)
oh god
"well, i was sat over there"...

shudder.
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:30, Reply)
isn't the fundamental problem there "sat" not "sitting" ?

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:32, Reply)
either "i sat" or "i was sitting" would be fine
"i was sat" implies someone picked you up and forcibly parked your arse.
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:43, Reply)
and no
the fundamental problem is, if you say that, you are a colossal fuckwit
(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:43, Reply)
I was not disputing that for a second, my dear.

(, Wed 25 Apr 2012, 12:47, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1