b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1653150 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

So yeah, I have new shoes and they ARE NOT BENT IN THE SLIGHTEST

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:02, 2 replies, latest was 13 years ago)
What have you got?

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:03, Reply)
This style, but with more elaborate perforation detail
www.gucinari.co.uk/eshop.php/product/department-id/58/product-id/1387/tan-leather-mens-shoe-with-punch-out-detail-in-different-tones-of-brown.html
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:05, Reply)
Nice.
I'll continue looking.
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:06, Reply)
Chelsea boots
Are still the dogs bollocks, for classic shoes.
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:11, Reply)
Rubbish.

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:13, Reply)
Every real man should own a pair of bollocks and classic chelsea boots.

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:18, Reply)
A comment so inane you gave us it twice.
Nice work.
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:19, Reply)
*doffs hat*

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:19, Reply)
*flicks Vs*

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:20, Reply)
that's one dull looking shoe
with some lame looking pointy toes
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:07, Reply)
They ain't for larpers, that's fo sho.
I maintain my position as the Pat Bateman of O/T.
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:09, Reply)
I'm thinking these
www.mr-shoes.co.uk/Products/jeffery-west-designer-shoes--jeffery-west-j139-tan
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:10, Reply)
Nice soles
But the diamond detailing is horrible.

Paul Smith are doing great shoes right now.
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:11, Reply)
I think they look a bit different.
And they are about half the price of Paul Smith.
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:14, Reply)
These are ace
www.paulsmith.co.uk/shop/paul-smith-mens-shoes-390/paul-smith-shoes-purple-chagall-shoe-sfxc-i004-ksu-v9/product.html
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:15, Reply)
You can't beat a nice pair of desert boots.

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:16, Reply)
Yes you can.

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:17, Reply)
I lived in desert boots from the age of 14 to 16.

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:21, Reply)
so northern
you couldn't even afford a house
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:25, Reply)
My latest purchase but didn't pay full whack.
www.muckbootcompany.com/Pages/default.asp
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:27, Reply)
error boots?

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:30, Reply)
Feck!
www.muckbootcompany.com/women/work/Pages/TackClassicHi.aspx
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:37, Reply)
*Waves*

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:40, Reply)
Hi Jeff.
Staying classy?
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:40, Reply)
As per.

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:41, Reply)
All I ever wear
In a variety of colours and finishes.
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:20, Reply)
+ If you're Willy fuckin' Wonka.

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:17, Reply)
these?
www.paulsmith.co.uk/shop/paul-smith-mens-shoes-390/paul-smith-shoes-blue-miller-brogue-sfxc-g493-wsh-n2/product.html
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:18, Reply)
I need work shoes.
Not wanker shoes.
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:19, Reply)
Depends on the job

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:39, Reply)
I read the other day
That Easton-Ellis is now so fucked up that he's set up twitter accounts for his characters.
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:11, Reply)
Probably does
I follow him on twitter, his big ting right now is that Stanley Kubrick was a gay.
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:12, Reply)
All straight lines and angles, are they?
SEE WHAT I DID THERE HAHAHAHA!!!
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:03, Reply)
They'd not be too comfortable then, I reckon

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:04, Reply)
BUT THEY WOULD BE HETERO!!!!1!1111!!!!!!

(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:05, Reply)
AND GEOMETRICALLY SATISFYING!
YES! YES! HAHAHAHAHA! YES!!!
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:06, Reply)
Now, call me old fashioned
But when I'm buying footwear I tend not to take my protractor and set-square.
(, Tue 26 Jun 2012, 21:08, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1