b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1780235 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

What if he was overtaking somone?

(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:40, 1 reply, 12 years ago)
not if he pulls out in front of someone going faster
The IAM could evoke his membership if he strays to far from 70.
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:42, Reply)
What if he pulled out into a clear lane,
but because you are doing 90mph you quickly came up behind him and then tailgated him while he completed the overtaking manuever?
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:44, Reply)
his fault, he should have seen me coming

(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:45, Reply)
You are an arrogant Audi driver AICMFP

(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:49, Reply)
nope
jut don't like weedy pricks getting in the way.

stick to the inside lane if you're scared
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:50, Reply)
In the way of you exceeding the speed limit by nearly 20% and in a dangerous manner?
Clearly your car is a substitute for your inadequate penis.
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:51, Reply)
Would have been dangeous back when the limit was set, but with modern brakes it's really not that bad at all

(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:52, Reply)
Yes it is.
Modern brakes haven't changed the laws of physics.
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:54, Reply)
Jim.

(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:54, Reply)
Or the stupidity of drivers
It should be perfectly safe to drive at 100+MPH on the motorway, in practice it's pretty bloody far from it, due to the failure of drivers to think about anyone but themselves.
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:56, Reply)
And we come back to my point about drivers pulling out into the way of faster moving traffic

(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:58, Reply)
Correct, but you won't cure that by trying to be an even bigger dick than them.

(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 14:03, Reply)
but I can try

(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 14:04, Reply)
there's no point being rational here.
we've already decided it's your fault.

Although, I don't understand why we can't have an elevated motorway speed limit in good conditions, with a reduced one in rain/poor visibility. Even the fucking French can manage that, and they're basically a baguette and some soft cheese away from being the third world.
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 14:06, Reply)
Who actually pays attention to that though?
I'll tell you who mighters, nobody, that's who.
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 14:15, Reply)
true.

(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 14:22, Reply)
no, but a 1.5 ton car on brakes from the 1960's would take a much longer time to stop than the same car fitted with modern brakes and tyres, fact.

(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:57, Reply)
Yes, but a modern car is heavier than a car from the 60s and therfore overall stopping distances are about the same.
FACT.
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:59, Reply)
bollocks
even my driving instructor said the that the stoping disatnces laid out i the highway code are out of date.
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 14:01, Reply)
Your driving instructer was a fucking nonce.

(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 14:15, Reply)
Indeed
but the thinking distance is still the same, and if you're tailgating in the outside lane less than a second (preferably two) behind the car in front you'll hit it before you get chance to use your undoubtedly wonderful modern brakes and tyres.
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 14:01, Reply)
yeah, but if you weren't in the way, then I wouldn't be tailgating you
therefore it's you fault
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 14:06, Reply)
I usually go around 80-85 on the motorway
and stay out of the outside lane as much as possible as it is full of ignorant cunts, so unlikely.
Many times I've undertaken a queue of such cunts simply by being in the otherwise empty inside lane, without altering speed.
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 14:10, Reply)
gay

(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 14:22, Reply)
and just like that, i win the argument

(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 14:22, Reply)
It's impossible for you to win an argument, by definition
Even if arguing with yourself
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 14:25, Reply)
A tricky situation
where some degree of fault would lie with both parties. I'd suggest, for simplicity, we continue to assume it's localboys fault, though.
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:47, Reply)
I'm going to have to agree with you here.

(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:51, Reply)
What if you were overtaking someone and were driving at about 80-85mph
but again, someone comes up behind you driving at about 90-100 and then tailgates you until you finish overtaking?
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:52, Reply)
Hmmm.
I think, again, we're going to have to consider the possbility that all responsibility for this lies with localboy.
(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:53, Reply)
I was basically leaning that way already.

(, Mon 12 Nov 2012, 13:54, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1