Off Topic
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
nope, miniscule is correct.
Soz swipeypoos.
( , Tue 8 Jan 2013, 13:33, 2 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
Soz swipeypoos.
( , Tue 8 Jan 2013, 13:33, 2 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
there you go monts, this proves it
as pd is never correct on anything.
( , Tue 8 Jan 2013, 13:34, Reply)
as pd is never correct on anything.
( , Tue 8 Jan 2013, 13:34, Reply)
See above.
Oh God, am I white-knighting a girl on the internet?
*checks gaz box for tit-gaz*
( , Tue 8 Jan 2013, 13:34, Reply)
Oh God, am I white-knighting a girl on the internet?
*checks gaz box for tit-gaz*
( , Tue 8 Jan 2013, 13:34, Reply)
i think there is a get out clause, let me check...
yes, clause 3.1 (m) (ii):
one shall not be a white knight if one's comment is made in the exclusive preserve of tackling a plum or a dozer
( , Tue 8 Jan 2013, 13:36, Reply)
yes, clause 3.1 (m) (ii):
one shall not be a white knight if one's comment is made in the exclusive preserve of tackling a plum or a dozer
( , Tue 8 Jan 2013, 13:36, Reply)
I refer you to the case of losers vs weepers.
Or Arkell vs Pressdram.
( , Tue 8 Jan 2013, 13:37, Reply)
Or Arkell vs Pressdram.
( , Tue 8 Jan 2013, 13:37, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread