what point?
"We didn't like someone's politics from 30 years ago and now she's dead we want to reiterate this point by wasting police time and money and trashing some parts of London?"
( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Tue 16 Apr 2013, 11:52, 2 replies, latest was 12 years ago)

Needs MOAR horse punching

( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Tue 16 Apr 2013, 11:53, Reply)

that'll send a message back in time to keep some defunct old industries alive at tax payers expense!

( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Tue 16 Apr 2013, 11:54, Reply)

YESSSSSS
*smashes bank window*
( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Tue 16 Apr 2013, 12:02, Reply)

nk windows ck doors
( hartley hare Just some prick who thinks it doesn't apply to him, Tue 16 Apr 2013, 12:04, Reply)

I do not claim to speak for any putative protesters,
however I suspect it would be the point that one's sins should not be forgotten or glossed over just because one is dead, and also that many people object strenuously to £10m of state money being spent on the funeral of a millionaire, especially under the current economic climate, when the money could well be spend on better things.
( CQ Knows the truth, all of it., Tue 16 Apr 2013, 12:09, Reply)

Both perfectly valid points.
Which are better expressed in ways that don't involve gloating and throwing bins through shopfronts.
( Kroney, Tue 16 Apr 2013, 12:10, Reply)

+costing the taxpayer even more money in policing costs

( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Tue 16 Apr 2013, 12:12, Reply)