Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
cycle lanes should be physically separate from the road and pavements.
It should go:
Raised pavement - kerb - cycle lane wide enough for two abreast - raised kerb/reservation - road.
(, Mon 1 Jul 2013, 11:57, 4 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
what a crying shame
(, Mon 1 Jul 2013, 11:59, Reply)
we call them "buildings"
(, Mon 1 Jul 2013, 12:11, Reply)
Road use restricted to buses and goods vehicles. You could then insert proper cycle lanes on the larger roads. The narrower roads could be human-power vehicles only.
(, Mon 1 Jul 2013, 12:03, Reply)
I was told it was a shit idea I seem to recall, apparently Norwich or somewhere tried it.
(, Mon 1 Jul 2013, 12:05, Reply)
is there's fuck all to replace cars. London's an entirely different situation.
(, Mon 1 Jul 2013, 12:06, Reply)
when i go to court later, i will have to take 3 boxes of files. how would i get those there if you banned all cars?
or were you including taxis? in which case, hmm, they could certainly trial it.
(, Mon 1 Jul 2013, 12:12, Reply)
it is much easier to read things on a paper file, and a million times easier on your poor eyes
(, Mon 1 Jul 2013, 12:15, Reply)
I wasn't including taxis, but it would be reasonable to do so, though they would not be permitted to travel down the human power-only side streets. You'd need a rickshaw for that.
(, Mon 1 Jul 2013, 12:14, Reply)
i would accept that
(, Mon 1 Jul 2013, 12:16, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread