+of adding an unwanted hour into an otherwise good film

( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Thu 21 Nov 2013, 16:19, 1 reply, 11 years ago)

I will disagree with you on this one.
You're a bit like my other half. he doesn't see the point in films that last over an hour and a half.

"If you can't get your story across in that time, it's probably not worth telling"

He prefers books. Not sure if this is irony.
( GeordieJay Bummers are deaf, Thu 21 Nov 2013, 16:24, Reply)

Dozer - irony check in aisle three, please.

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Thu 21 Nov 2013, 16:26, Reply)

I'll bring the mop.

( GeordieJay Bummers are deaf, Thu 21 Nov 2013, 16:28, Reply)

Unless he can read books in under an hour and a half then this makes no sense at all.

( Kroney, Thu 21 Nov 2013, 16:27, Reply)

He probably could. He goes through about three a week.

( GeordieJay Bummers are deaf, Thu 21 Nov 2013, 16:28, Reply)

and no, they aren;t "Ladybird" books.

( GeordieJay Bummers are deaf, Thu 21 Nov 2013, 16:29, Reply)

* Sees spot run*

(Bonzodog29 is an unemployed sponge of the worst kind, Thu 21 Nov 2013, 16:30, Reply)

What about books though?

( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Thu 21 Nov 2013, 16:29, Reply)

I have no problem with long films but making them long and it adding nothing to the story is a pain

( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Thu 21 Nov 2013, 16:30, Reply)

Depending on the film, it's more about character development and attachment so you feel something for them.

( GeordieJay Bummers are deaf, Thu 21 Nov 2013, 16:32, Reply)