b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 2164393 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

your bible bashing does worry me
badger, sort him out. he's a Believer.
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:29, 3 replies, latest was 11 years ago)

v b
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:29, Reply)
Then I saw his face...

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:29, Reply)
it looked like a plasterer's radio.

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:30, Reply)
I believe in Jesus as much as I believe in your silly phonecall story being a 'sign' or whatever nonsense you go on about.

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:31, Reply)
Women, eh?

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:32, Reply)
Can't live with them
Can't kill them and leave them in a shallow unmarked grave.
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:33, Reply)
Well, you can........

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:33, Reply)
If you're going to follow that argument
you also "can" live with them.
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:34, Reply)
Well, you can......

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:34, Reply)
*finger-guns*
Now you get it.
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:35, Reply)
They are IDIOTS Jason, you've got the right idea

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:34, Reply)
No-strings casual sex with men is just SO much less hassle.

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:34, Reply)
and yet for some reason, one's boyfriends always complain about it

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:35, Reply)
that's becuase they aren't getting the sex.

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:38, Reply)
No, nope, nah.
I'm a rare breed.

A monogamous gay.
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:37, Reply)

ogamous

umental
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:39, Reply)
TOP

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:46, Reply)
wasn't suggesting otherwise, old fruit.
I was just espousing the lovely theory that, if one were in the market for no-strings sex, mano-e-mano would result in less of the needy texts afterwards.
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:40, Reply)
NOTCH

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:46, Reply)
Monogaymy.

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:40, Reply)
REPLIES

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:47, Reply)
no sign
you need to work out a LOGICAL reason as to why someone was in a locked school at 5.30am and calling me. no spiritual bollocks, no "ooh coincidence, they happen love" laziness. WE WANT FACTS.
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:35, Reply)
It's a FACT that coincidences happen dickhead.
You are such a twat sometimes.
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:37, Reply)
Janitor
security... or even PBX failure.
Rerouting call
Someone scribbling down the "good time" number from the local dogging spot and inputting it into an autodial
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:38, Reply)
the last one is the closest anyone has come to a reasonable suggestion

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:41, Reply)
Good time?

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:43, Reply)
Well, no. RAther, you need to prove how a ghost worked a phone.
In the same way I don't have to prove there ISN'T a God, the burden of proof lies on the person making up the fairy tale.

That's SCIENCE, sweetie xx
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:38, Reply)
nononononononooooooooooooooooooooooo
i'm not saying there was a ghost. there are no ghosts. but "a wrong number" is too great a stretch when the other facts are taken into account. "coincidence" is a lazy word to explain what we can't be arsed to work out.
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:40, Reply)
There are no other facts that are relevant, so nothing needs to be taken into account.
You are attaching an emotional meaning to something in which emotion has no relevance.

That number was stastically no less likely to wrong dial you than any other number. Do you think there's some deeper meaning to every wrong number you get? because any of them are equally as likely as that one.
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:45, Reply)
Y'know, I had a premonition you would say something like that.
Weird, eh?
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:47, Reply)
THAT CAN'T BE A COINCIDENCE

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:47, Reply)
It's almost like you're psychic, eh?
On which note, Derek Acorah has been charged after crashing his car at the weekend. I really, really, hope that, as well as the drink driving, they charge him for "not seeing it coming"
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:51, Reply)
I love how Most Haunted televised when they caught him out.
They fed him a name 'Creed Kafer' which was an anagram of Derek Faker. Not only did he come up with the name but he hilariously said it when he was "possessed" and yelled it out. CREEEEEEEEEEEED KAAAAAFERRRRRRR!

ilol'd
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:54, Reply)
No it isn't.

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:58, Reply)
It is if you read it on the internet and took it as fact.

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 15:03, Reply)
Tell that to Yvette.

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 15:05, Reply)
*Kreed Kafer*

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 15:08, Reply)
His real name is Derek Johnson anyway. The whole thing is fake.

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 15:15, Reply)
surely the likelihood of getting a wrong number from a building that you know
has to be statistically smaller than all the other buildings in the world.

never mind the fact that nobody is in a non-boarding school at 5am...
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 15:01, Reply)
The odds go up dramatically if there is a ghost mum roaming the corridors though

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 15:04, Reply)
Erm, no. Not in the slightest.
OK, I'm not being patronising here, I swear, because this part of probability tends to confuse a lot of people, but the subset of phone numbers or buildings you do know (very small) vs the subset of phone numbers of buildings you don't (very large) has no bearing at all on those phone numbers calling you. It's just statistically irrelevant, assuming you assume that the call isn't meant for you. It simply comes down to the number, and each number has an equal chance of calling you. Same as each lottery ball has an equal chance of being drawn.

If the call WAS for you, of course, then the opposite of what you think is actually true, it's much more likely to come from a number of a building you do know, but that's not a straight probability question.
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 15:11, Reply)
I think the WE section of that pathetic outburst has somewhat backfired, love.

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:39, Reply)
IT'S THE ROYAL WE

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 15:01, Reply)
What happened, in a nutshell?
I will get Sally Morgan on it.
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 14:48, Reply)
i dreamed my mum was trying to speak to me and i couldn't understand what she was saying
woke up, bad dream, gah, back to sleep.

found mobile in morning with missed call from unknown number at 5am, when I was waking up. dialled it back. was my mother's school. where nobody should have been at 5am, and certainly where nobody had my private mobile number.
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 15:04, Reply)
That is a bit strange mind.
Ever had a call from the school before?
You hadn't dialled it either?
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 15:08, Reply)
Please Jay, let's not go through it all again eh?

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 15:09, Reply)
:( I MISSED IT FIRST TIME ROUND :(
Just gaz me, yeah?
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 15:14, Reply)
HTH XXXX
b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post2093330
(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 15:17, Reply)
Thx bbz xx

(, Mon 9 Dec 2013, 15:24, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1