Because she's entitled to all of that since he signed a legally binding contract with her sharing their possessions.

(Bazongaloid, Thu 27 Feb 2014, 9:09, 2 replies, latest was 11 years ago)

i didn't read the paperwork, obviously
but there must be massive grounds for argument over the terms of the sharing. hence his lawyers fighting hers.

but morally, she's got a lot of questions to answer, if she thinks that living with someone for 6 months entitles her to a free house.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Thu 27 Feb 2014, 9:12, Reply)

people are greedy cunts innit.

( MEATSNAKE Richard Hammond, Thu 27 Feb 2014, 9:13, Reply)

he was also a twat for marrying someone just because she was hot
so I don't have any sympathy for him either. but greggs hat would come back from appointments and tell me the latest in their court battle, and it made me want to punch her stupid face.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Thu 27 Feb 2014, 9:15, Reply)

My ex has been trying to claim I should pay for things for her that I don't have myself; such as private dental insurance.
Ridiculous. The court won't go for that.
( Fucking hell Jeff I am not a robot, Thu 27 Feb 2014, 9:18, Reply)

classic strategy of don't ask, don't get, i guess
throw in a few things it's easy to concede so that you look reasonable for the bigger things.

she's another one. ask for dental insurance for micro, and pay for your own dental insurance, you over-entitled cow.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Thu 27 Feb 2014, 9:19, Reply)

Quite.

( Fucking hell Jeff I am not a robot, Thu 27 Feb 2014, 9:21, Reply)

That's not how the courts interpret it now.
They consider all sorts of things; what assets each had prior to the marriage, joint assets acquired during the marriage, the length of the marriage (and the length of time spent cohabiting before the marriage), earning capability of each person, what the lower earning partner needs to live on etc.
( Fucking hell Jeff I am not a robot, Thu 27 Feb 2014, 9:13, Reply)