b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 2294583 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I'm a good nurse when Mrs Vagabond's ill.
The rest of the world can get tae fuck.

Alt: I watched Top Gun for the first time. Dear Christ - I'd heard about it being really gay and homoerotic, but I always assumed people were over-exaggerating. And it's shit - really shit. Even by the standards of the day. Awful film.

I also watched Robocop for the first time. That were good.

No - I dint watch much cinema as a kid - my dad didn't believe in it and my school only had a couple of tellies, the viewing on which were dominated by the big kids.
(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 10:51, 2 replies, latest was 11 years ago)
Top Gun is absolute gash
Mainly because they tried to pass off Northrop F-5s (US aircraft) as MiGs (Soviet aircraft).

/ExtremeGeekBlog
(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:01, Reply)
Excellent geeking here.
WWII is more my field - I recently overheard a someone refer to a Westland Lysander as "cargo plane" which rather upset me.
(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:06, Reply)
For a *very* small amount of cargo.....

(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:20, Reply)
Well quite.
It was far more of a transit plane for injecting spies/parachutists into an area or for unique well-targeted bombings.

Cargo is like ... Lancasters, Wellingtons and shiz, inner.
(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:28, Reply)
Yer
the Lysander was very STOL so could land in a field, many stories of being landed/taken off in distances substantially shorter than the designers ever intended....
(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:31, Reply)
I seem to remember something about them being able to fly at 40mph or something? But that can't be right - they couldn't maintain airspeed velocity at that.
Laden or unladen. But yeah - landing and taking off from a field = very useful.
(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:34, Reply)
I can see your neckbeards

(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:36, Reply)
Touch it.
It's silky-smooth.
(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:55, Reply)
The original Robocop or the new one?

(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:03, Reply)
Original.
I've been advised that the Director's Cut is even better.
(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:05, Reply)
I love the original

(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:05, Reply)
Yer - it's still pretty gritty for what it is.
Also I like how it's a little bit funny.
(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:07, Reply)
*buys that for a dollar*
The hand shooting scene is one of the few things I cannot watch. See also Blade Runner when Harrison Ford's fingers get broken
(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:09, Reply)
What surprised me was the other robot - the first version - Ed 9000 or whatever.
The models were fine, but the photography was awful - considering it was about 10 years after Star Wars and that.
(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:17, Reply)
They did only have 20 seconds to comply though

(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:27, Reply)
I thought it was 15 seconds.

(, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:28, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1