data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a question"
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
It was far more of a transit plane for injecting spies/parachutists into an area or for unique well-targeted bombings.
Cargo is like ... Lancasters, Wellingtons and shiz, inner.
( , Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:28, 1 reply, 11 years ago)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
the Lysander was very STOL so could land in a field, many stories of being landed/taken off in distances substantially shorter than the designers ever intended....
( , Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:31, Reply)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
Laden or unladen. But yeah - landing and taking off from a field = very useful.
( , Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:34, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread