b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 296131 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | Popular

Who was shocked
at the early QOTW closure?
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 11:48, 25 replies, latest was 17 years ago)
Shocked...
but glad!
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 11:48, Reply)
Me..
But it was really late last week
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 11:52, Reply)
ME!
I clicked the next answer and thought... I've read this before.. Has someone pea-roasted? Then I saw my own reply and thought the world had gone insane.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 11:52, Reply)
I reckon
it's because the last post was a shameless plug for us to rate someone's baby in a newspaper and the username was miss_stella_drinker. I think she broke b3ta.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 11:52, Reply)
Mr. Fish Trombone
My greatest regret is that I didn't get to click "Post this message" on my reply to that...

Ugly big-headed weirdos.
I fuckin' hate babies.
But I hate parents more.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 11:55, Reply)
Amen
I was hanging back on destroying her because since I'm still relatively new, I wasn;t sure if b3tans love babies.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 11:59, Reply)
Yeah
she is quite new, although I suppose the odd shameless plug can't be too bad (in OT?)
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 12:01, Reply)
Well...
We do love them. In a sensual way.

Didn't you read the section on the FAQ, new-meat?

I'm joking. Or something. Nice to meat meet you!
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 12:03, Reply)
Depends what it's for
If it was a charity dealy then fair enough. But those bonny baby things are just abhorrent.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 12:03, Reply)
The fact of the matter is
That all babies are bulbous-headed, bulgy-eyed freaks.

Anyone who says otherwise, particularly about their own hideous crotch-fruit, should be put down.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 12:06, Reply)
I was!
Even more when I realised there was no new one.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 12:10, Reply)
That post really made me angry.
You think your baby is lovely? Fine. You want other people to judge your baby and vote for it? Not fine.

What are they judged on anyway? How much they puke, shit and cry in a single day?
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 12:10, Reply)
If you're going to make babies compete
Make them earn praise. Get them to do an army obstacle course or knife fight or something.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 12:12, Reply)
My mum
expermients on babies for a living...

I was halfway through a post about her. Oh well.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 12:14, Reply)
I experiment on babies too!
Mostly with lit cigarettes.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 12:15, Reply)
A baby Knife fight
would be less interesting than a monkey knife fight tho
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 12:19, Reply)
But a monkey knife fight
Would be cruel. Getting babies to do it is genius.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 12:26, Reply)
Chav babies?
then we could solve the problem with the chav underclass...

Although then they'd probably just celebrify them...
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 12:32, Reply)
Plus
if one baby stabs another baby nobody can be arrested!
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 12:35, Reply)
Better yet
tie a pair of them together at the ankles and make a set of babychucks out of them, and bring THAT to the knife fight!
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 13:29, Reply)
I raise your babychucks
with my...


3 SECTIONED BABY STAFF!!!!!!!!!
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 14:06, Reply)
Baby staff?...
...ummmm...

okay, there's a Gary Glitter joke in here somewhere...
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 14:35, Reply)
3 Baby sectioned staff?
It doesn't matter does it, it's looking bad either way
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 14:44, Reply)
Well...
...there is precedence.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 17:40, Reply)
Baby fights?
Fine...

Just wait until you're the bloody fool who has to referee.


Wooden spoons make excellent 'persuaders' on small children.
(, Thu 6 Nov 2008, 19:15, Reply)

« Go Back | Reply To This »

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1