Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
but - when you look at things at the atomic level, and then at the astronomic level, isn't everythnig the same.
Our atoms are just star systems, our galaxies just electrons and protons - the earth just strange quarks, the moon dark matter...
Do many people subscribe to this theory?
Is this fractal theory?
We can zoom in and out and it's all just one great mandlebrot? should I just crack open the vodka?
(, Mon 13 Apr 2009, 1:09, 7 replies, latest was 17 years ago)
okay, so 30 or so...
i remember seeing an animated film about scale, zooming in and in and in until i wanted to be sick. i remember a mosquito sucking blood, the scene zooming in on the blood cells.
the whole thing was also reversed, up to the scale of galaxies and shit. the general impression i got (as a kid) was that the really huge and the absolutely tiny were the same thing. gave me fucking nightmares!!!
years later my good friend mike vortex (R.I.P.) lent me a book called "the chaos of nature" (or there abouts) which was a collection of images of river-deltas and ferns, hurricanes and rivulets, all showing that what nature writes large she also writes so very small...
you are not alone ;-)
(, Mon 13 Apr 2009, 1:34, Reply)
But I'm sure you'll love powers of 10 to go with your vodka.
(, Mon 13 Apr 2009, 9:18, Reply)
Men In Black, so it must be true. we all live in a pendant on a cat in a marble in a locker.
(, Mon 13 Apr 2009, 10:53, Reply)
who was convinced that the solar system was a gold atom, as gold atoms have 9 electrons or something.
Not sure if that's right, we didn't have a physics teacher at school!
(, Mon 13 Apr 2009, 15:10, Reply)
It's probably because of the 1/r*r properties of both the gravitational and electrical fields driving most pictoral models of electron orbits to look like orbiting bodies rather than the more-correct (but much harder to illustrate) probability density maps.
(, Mon 13 Apr 2009, 19:44, Reply)
it's all because scientists can't draw?
edit: i like this reply to reply thing. it's swish
(, Mon 13 Apr 2009, 20:26, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »